Beyond Verifiable Rewards: Rubric-Based GRM for Reinforced Fine-Tuning SWE Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite recent progress in Large Language Model (LLM) Agents for Software Engineering (SWE) tasks, end-to-end fine-tuning typically relies on verifiable terminal rewards such as whether all unit tests pass. While these binary signals reflect whether the final solution is correct, they provide little guidance for shaping intermediate behaviors during multi-step interactions, thereby limiting improvements in the overall quality of the resolution process. To address this, we introduce a rubric-based Generative Reward Model (GRM) that provides richer learning signals. The GRM is equipped with human-designed rubrics that indicate criteria for encouraging or discouraging specific behavioral patterns, and we leverage this feedback for high-quality training data collection via trajectory filtration. When used for Reinforced Fine-Tuning (RFT) on SWE Tasks, our approach outperforms terminal-score-only rejection sampling: it more effectively suppresses undesirable patterns while promoting beneficial ones, as confirmed by case analyses, and it ultimately improves final test accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 35 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
35 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SWE-rebench: An Automated Pipeline for Task Collection and Decontaminated Evaluation of Software Engineering Agents26 May
- 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents30 Apr
- 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym30 Dec
- 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey4 Sep
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
- 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges14 Jan
Other references · 28
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
- 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
- 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 385
- 2022CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 342
16 more
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
- 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 233
- 2023Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Visioncited by 163
- 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 163
- 2025Seed1.5-Thinking: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 159
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 149
- 2024Generative Reward Modelscited by 148
- 2024RLEF: Grounding Code LLMs in Execution Feedback with Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
- 2022Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 133
- 2023OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 84
- 2024LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Textscited by 81
- 2023Evaluating the Code Quality of AI-Assisted Code Generation Tools: An Empirical Study on GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and ChatGPTcited by 71
- 2023SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Modelscited by 54
- 2025SETS: Leveraging Self-Verification and Self-Correction for Improved Test-Time Scalingcited by 54
- 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Modelscited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-Training
- 2025When Agents go Astray: Course-Correcting SWE Agents with PRMs
- 2026SWE-TRACE: Optimizing Long-Horizon SWE Agents Through Rubric Process Reward Models and Heuristic Test-Time Scaling
- 2026Agentic Rubrics as Contextual Verifiers for SWE Agents
- 2026SWE-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Code Agents
- 2025SWE-RM: Execution-free Feedback For Software Engineering Agents
- 2026Rationale Matters: Learning Transferable Rubrics via Proxy-Guided Critique for VLM Reward Models
- 2026AdaRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubrics for Reliable LLM Agent Evaluation and Reward Learning