Why Fine-Tuning Encourages Hallucinations and How to Fix It
On the map: Knowledge distillation → Knowledge distillation for LLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are prone to hallucinating factually incorrect statements. A key source of these errors is exposure to new factual information through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which can increase hallucinations w.r.t.~knowledge acquired during pre-training. Since these errors arise as a by-product of knowledge degradation, we explore whether established continual learning tools can mitigate them. We propose a self-distillation-based SFT method that facilitates effective factual learning while minimizing hallucinations w.r.t.~pre-existing knowledge by regularizing output-distribution drift. We also show that when new knowledge acquisition is unnecessary, suppressing factual plasticity by freezing parameter groups preserves task performance while reducing hallucinations. Lastly, we investigate the mechanism, contrasting capacity limitations, behavior cloning, and localized interference. Our experiments show that a main driver is interference among overlapping semantic representations, which self-distillation mitigates and an associative-memory model explains: forgetting grows with the overlap between new and stored facts.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 49 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
49 of 58 references.
References · 49
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
37 more
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 247
- 2021Online Continual Learning in Image Classification: An Empirical Surveycited by 245
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 244
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 232
- 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 178
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
- 2021Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Modelscited by 174
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 144
- 2021Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrieverscited by 140
- 2022Analyzing Transformers in Embedding Spacecited by 132
- 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 79
- 2024Understanding Factual Recall in Transformers via Associative Memoriescited by 51
- 2024From Tokens to Words: On the Inner Lexicon of LLMscited by 48
- 2024Summing Up the Facts: Additive Mechanisms Behind Factual Recall in LLMscited by 42
- 2023Achieving a Better Stability-Plasticity Trade-off via Auxiliary Networks in Continual Learningcited by 41
- 2025How do language models learn facts? Dynamics, curricula and hallucinationscited by 37
- 2023Error Sensitivity Modulation based Experience Replay: Mitigating Abrupt Representation Drift in Continual Learningcited by 27
- 2024BiLD: Bi-directional Logits Difference Loss for Large Language Model Distillationcited by 19
- 2024Representation Shattering in Transformers: A Synthetic Study with Knowledge Editingcited by 19
- 2024From Single to Multi: How LLMs Hallucinate in Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 17
- 2024Inferring Functionality of Attention Heads from their Parameterscited by 17
- 2026Thinking to Recall: How Reasoning Unlocks Parametric Knowledge in LLMscited by 16
- 2025Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyondcited by 12
- 2026Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric Factualitycited by 12
- 2025How to Teach Large Multimodal Models New Skillscited by 11
- 2024Continual Memorization of Factoids in Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Towards Long Context Hallucination Detectioncited by 7
- 2025HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axescited by 6
- 2025Measuring Representational Shifts in Continual Learning: A Linear Transformation Perspectivecited by 5
- 2025Follow the Flow: On Information Flow Across Textual Tokens in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 4
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Improves Traversal of Parametric Knowledge in LLMscited by 4
- 2026Putting a Face to Forgetting: Continual Learning meets Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forwardcited by 5
- 2026MoRFI: Monotonic Sparse Autoencoder Feature Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Knowing but Not Saying: Preventing Factual Access Failures in LLM SFT via Recall-Anchored Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstentioncited by 0
- 2026Stick to What You Know: A Study of Knowledge-Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recallcited by 0
- 2026Data-Centric Post-Training for Financial Reasoning: Mining, Distillation, and Verifiable Learningcited by 0
- 2026Data-Centric Post-Training for Financial Reasoning: Mining, Distillation, and Verifiable Learning9 Sep 2026
- 2026Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recall1 Sep 2026
- 2026Stick to What You Know: A Study of Knowledge-Aligned Supervised Fine-Tuning31 Aug 2026
- 2026Knowing but Not Saying: Preventing Factual Access Failures in LLM SFT via Recall-Anchored Distillation21 Aug 2026
- 2026Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention19 Jun 2026
- 2026Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward2 May 2026
- 2026MoRFI: Monotonic Sparse Autoencoder Feature Identification29 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Smoothing Out Hallucinations: Mitigating LLM Hallucination with Smoothed Knowledge Distillation
- 2024Banishing LLM Hallucinations Requires Rethinking Generalization
- 2026Mitigating Prompt-Induced Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Structured Reasoning
- 2025Reasoning Models Hallucinate More: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
- 2024Learning to Trust Your Feelings: Leveraging Self-awareness in LLMs for Hallucination Mitigation
- 2026Listen to the Layers: Mitigating Hallucinations with Inter-Layer Disagreement
- 2026KARL: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Knowledge-Boundary-Aware Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Thinking, Faithful and Stable: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs