Reinforcement Learning Improves Traversal of Parametric Knowledge in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) is often credited with improving reasoning at the expense of factual knowledge. We instead find that reasoning models outperform their instruction-tuned versions on factual recall by accessing existing parametric knowledge more effectively. Across five model families, structured prompting, which explicitly guides models through hierarchical traversal, recovers most of this gap, suggesting that much of the missing knowledge is latent rather than absent. Controlled RL experiments further support this: training on unseen, non-extractable facts improves recall of held-out, frequent but previously inaccessible facts, ruling out simple data exposure. Decomposing the training objective further attributes this gain to iterated on-policy exploration. The same mechanism appears behaviorally and internally: the reasoning advantage grows with retrieval depth, while layerwise analysis finds similar factual representations but divergent query representations. Distilled models, in contrast, often imitate self-correction without acquiring the exploration needed for navigation. Together, these findings suggest that improving factual recall in LLMs depends not only on expanding what models know but also on teaching them to navigate it, motivating future post-training methods that optimize traversal.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2025.
Builds on
35 of 53 references.
References · 35
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
23 more
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 449
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 288
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 242
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
- 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 181
- 2024Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokenscited by 148
- 2025Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretrainingcited by 123
- 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 110
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 101
- 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 92
- 2024A Closer Look at the Limitations of Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2025Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challengescited by 19
- 2025Spectrum Tuning: Post-Training for Distributional Coverage and In-Context Steerabilitycited by 17
- 2024Towards a Holistic Evaluation of LLMs on Factual Knowledge Recallcited by 8
- 2025Beyond Reasoning Gains: Mitigating General-Capability Forgetting in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 5
- 2025Knowledge-Level Consistency Reinforcement Learning: Dual-Fact Alignment for Long-Form Factualitycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Reasoning: Reinforcement Learning Unlocks Parametric Knowledge in LLMs
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Thinking to Recall: How Reasoning Unlocks Parametric Knowledge in LLMs
- 2024Unveiling Factual Recall Behaviors of Large Language Models through Knowledge Neurons
- 2026How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
- 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns
- 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMs
- 2025Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection