mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Do LLMs and VLMs Understand Viewpoint Rotation Without Vision? An Interpretability Study

arXiv 2604.15294 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past year, spatial intelligence has drawn increasing attention. Many prior works study it from the perspective of visual-spatial intelligence, where models have access to visuospatial information from visual inputs. However, in the absence of visual information, whether linguistic intelligence alone is sufficient to endow models with spatial intelligence, and how models perform relevant tasks with text-only inputs still remain unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on a fundamental and critical capability in spatial intelligence from a linguistic perspective: viewpoint rotation understanding (VRU). Specifically, LLMs and VLMs are asked to infer their final viewpoint and predict the corresponding observation in an environment given textual description of viewpoint rotation and observation over multiple steps. We find that both LLMs and VLMs perform poorly on our proposed dataset while human can easily achieve 100% accuracy, indicating a substantial gap between current model capabilities and the requirements of spatial intelligence. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we conduct a layer-wise probing analysis and head-wise causal intervention. Our findings reveal that although models encode viewpoint information in the hidden states, they appear to struggle to bind the viewpoint position with corresponding observation, resulting in a hallucination in final layers. Finally, we selectively fine-tune the key attention heads identified by causal intervention to improve VRU performance. Experimental results demonstrate that such selective fine-tuning achieves improved VRU performance while avoiding catastrophic forgetting of generic abilities. Our dataset and code will be released at https://github.com/Young-Zhen/VRU_Interpret .

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.

Builds on

37 of 56 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  8. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  9. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  10. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  11. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  12. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
25 more
  1. 2024Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spacescited by 611
  2. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
  3. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 231
  4. 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 195
  5. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
  6. 20243DSRBench: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 139
  7. 2025From Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3Dcited by 138
  8. 2024MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 88
  9. 2024On the Role of Attention Heads in Large Language Model Safetycited by 72
  10. 2022StepGame: A New Benchmark for Robust Multi-Hop Spatial Reasoning in Textscited by 68
  11. 2024Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models?cited by 66
  12. 2024How Large Language Models Encode Context Knowledge? A Layer-Wise Probing Studycited by 64
  13. 2024LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scalecited by 63
  14. 2024LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM Representationscited by 57
  15. 2024Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculationcited by 45
  16. 2025Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuitscited by 44
  17. 2024Interpreting Arithmetic Mechanism in Large Language Models through Comparative Neuron Analysiscited by 31
  18. 2024SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluationcited by 31
  19. 2024Advancing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models: An In-Depth Evaluation and Enhancement Using the StepGame Benchmarkcited by 27
  20. 2025H-Neurons: On the Existence, Impact, and Origin of Hallucination-Associated Neurons in LLMscited by 22
  21. 2025A Survey of Large Language Model-Powered Spatial Intelligence Across Scales: Advances in Embodied Agents, Smart Cities, and Earth Sciencecited by 12
  22. 2026Can LLMs See Without Pixels? Benchmarking Spatial Intelligence from Textual Descriptionscited by 7
  23. 2025Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just A Few Attention Headscited by 5
  24. 2025Do LVLMs Know What They Know? A Systematic Study of Knowledge Boundary Perception in LVLMscited by 4
  25. 2025Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspectivecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025How Far are VLMs from Visual Spatial Intelligence? A Benchmark-Driven Perspective
  2. 2025Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models
  3. 2025SpinBench: Perspective and Rotation as a Lens on Spatial Reasoning in VLMs
  4. 2025Why Do MLLMs Struggle with Spatial Understanding? A Systematic Analysis from Data to Architecture
  5. 2024When LLMs step into the 3D World: A Survey and Meta-Analysis of 3D Tasks via Multi-modal Large Language Models
  6. 2026Render to Reason: Novel-View Semantic Prediction Improves Spatial Understanding in VLMs
  7. 2026Seeing Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Know When Not to Answer Spatial Questions (and Why)?
  8. 2026Consistent Yet Wrong: Evidence Insensitivity in Spatial Vision-Language Models