Agentic Microphysics: A Manifesto for Generative AI Safety
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper advances a methodological proposal for safety research in agentic AI. As systems acquire planning, memory, tool use, persistent identity, and sustained interaction, safety can no longer be analysed primarily at the level of the isolated model. Population-level risks arise from structured interaction among agents, through processes of communication, observation, and mutual influence that shape collective behaviour over time. As the object of analysis shifts, a methodological gap emerges. Approaches focused either on single agents or on aggregate outcomes do not identify the interaction-level mechanisms that generate collective risks or the design variables that control them. A framework is required that links local interaction structure to population-level dynamics in a causally explicit way, allowing both explanation and intervention. We introduce two linked concepts. Agentic microphysics defines the level of analysis: local interaction dynamics where one agent's output becomes another's input under specific protocol conditions. Generative safety defines the methodology: growing phenomena and elicit risks from micro-level conditions to identify sufficient mechanisms, detect thresholds, and design effective interventions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
23 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Beyond Single-Agent Safety: A Taxonomy of Risks in LLM-to-LLM Interactions2 Dec
- 2025Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threats5 Oct
Other references · 21
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 431
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
- 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 287
- 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 258
- 2025AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Societycited by 186
- 2025Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AIcited by 163
- 2023Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agentscited by 154
- 2024Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populationscited by 123
- 2024Nicer Than Humans: How do Large Language Models Behave in the Prisoner's Dilemma?cited by 63
9 more
- 2025Beyond Self-Talk: A Communication-Centric Survey of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 62
- 2025Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Modelscited by 53
- 2024Decoding Echo Chambers: LLM-Powered Simulations Revealing Polarization in Social Networkscited by 33
- 2024Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitionscited by 26
- 2023Emergence of Scale-Free Networks in Social Interactions among Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2026Institutional AI: Governing LLM Collusion in Multi-Agent Cournot Markets via Public Governance Graphscited by 20
- 2025Herd Behavior: Investigating Peer Influence in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 15
- 2025Everyone Contributes! Incentivizing Strategic Cooperation in Multi-LLM Systems via Sequential Public Goods Gamescited by 4
- 2025Towards Operational Validation of LLM-Agent Social Simulations: A Replicated Study of a Reddit-like Technology Forumcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Xeno-Interpretability: Investigating the Alien Minds of LLMs17 Sep 2026
- 2026Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety21 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
- 2026Agentic Safety is an Epistemic Property, Not a Behavioral One
- 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems
- 2025Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Beyond single-channel agentic benchmarking
- 2025Safety Must Precede the Deployment of Open-Ended AI
- 2025Multimodal Safety Evaluation in Generative Agent Social Simulations
- 2025From Refusal to Recovery: A Control-Theoretic Approach to Generative AI Guardrails