mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explain the Flag: Contextualizing Hate Speech Beyond Censorship

arXiv 2604.14970 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hate, derogatory, and offensive speech remains a persistent challenge in online platforms and public discourse. While automated detection systems are widely used, most focus on censorship or removal, raising concerns for transparency and freedom of expression, and limiting opportunities to explain why content is harmful. To address these issues, explanatory approaches have emerged as a promising solution, aiming to make hate speech detection more transparent, accountable, and informative. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with three newly created and curated vocabularies to detect and explain hate speech in English, French, and Greek. Our system captures both inherently derogatory expressions tied to identity characteristics and direct group-targeted content through two complementary pipelines: one that detects and disambiguates problematic terms using the curated vocabularies, and one that leverages LLMs as context-aware evaluators of group-targeting content. The outputs are fused into grounded explanations that clarify why content is flagged. Human evaluation shows that our hybrid approach is accurate, with high-quality explanations, outperforming LLM-only baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.

Builds on

22 of 46 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  2. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  3. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  4. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  5. 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
  6. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  7. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  8. 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
  9. 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
  10. 2020Demoting Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detectioncited by 62
  11. 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
  12. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
10 more
  1. 2020Detecting East Asian Prejudice on Social Mediacited by 40
  2. 2022Chain of Explanation: New Prompting Method to Generate Higher Quality Natural Language Explanation for Implicit Hate Speechcited by 25
  3. 2024From Languages to Geographies: Towards Evaluating Cultural Bias in Hate Speech Datasetscited by 23
  4. 2016A Dictionary-based Approach to Racism Detection in Dutch Social Mediacited by 15
  5. 2020Leveraging Affective Bidirectional Transformers for Offensive Language Detectioncited by 11
  6. 2018Context-Aware Attention for Understanding Twitter Abusecited by 9
  7. 2021Do explanations increase the effectiveness of AI-crowd generated fake news warnings?cited by 8
  8. 2024Towards Efficient and Explainable Hate Speech Detection via Model Distillationcited by 5
  9. 2026Self-Explaining Hate Speech Detection with Moral Rationalescited by 5
  10. 2025Don't Erase, Inform! Detecting and Contextualizing Harmful Language in Cultural Heritage Collectionscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.