mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Problem Reductions at Scale: Agentic Integration of Computationally Hard Problems

arXiv 2604.11535 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Solving an NP-hard optimization problem often requires reformulating it for a specific solver -- quantum hardware, a commercial optimizer, or a domain heuristic. A tool for polynomial-time reductions between hard problems would let practitioners route any supported problem to any supported solver through a single interface. Building such a library at scale, however, has remained out of reach. We show that harness engineering, the practice of designing constraints, verification systems, and feedback loops that channel AI coding agents, can overcome this barrier. Our harness combines a no-code contribution route for domain experts, a multilayer verification stack ranging from type-level checks to agentic feature tests (AI agents role-playing as end users), and a fully automated implementation-review-integration pipeline. In about three months, we built a command-line tool backed by a library of 100+ problem types and 200+ reduction rules in over 170k lines of Rust. The result suggests that a well-engineered harness lets agents build well-tested software at a scale and pace beyond prior reduction-library efforts. Because the reduction graph composes transitively, a new solver registered for any single problem type instantly becomes available to every problem connected by a reduction path. The source code is available at https://github.com/CodingThrust/problem-reductions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

18 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces15 Feb
  2. 2025SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios20 Dec
  3. 2025Live-SWE-agent: Can Software Engineering Agents Self-Evolve on the Fly?17 Nov
  4. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  5. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 13

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  3. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
  4. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 491
  5. 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexitycited by 302
  6. 2025SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?cited by 279
  7. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
  8. 2013Ising formulations of many NP problemscited by 207
  9. 2021Combinatorial Optimization with Physics-Inspired Graph Neural Networkscited by 108
  10. 2025Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivitycited by 101
  11. 2015Parallelizing the dual revised simplex methodcited by 89
  12. 2013Exact Algorithms for Maximum Independent Setcited by 10
1 more
  1. 2023QUBO.jl: A Julia Ecosystem for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MAS-Algorithm: A Workflow for Solving Algorithmic Programming Problems with a Multi-Agent System
  2. 2026Mixture of Self-Improving Branches For Agent Harness Optimization
  3. 2026HarnessOpt-Bench: Evaluating LLMs at Harness Optimization
  4. 2026ClayBuddy: A Framework, Evaluation, & Mitigation of Coding Agent Failures
  5. 2026Agent Factories for High Level Synthesis: How Far Can General-Purpose Coding Agents Go in Hardware Optimization?
  6. 2026A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline
  7. 2026TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization
  8. 2026RigorBench: Benchmarking Engineering Process Discipline in Autonomous AI Coding Agents