mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BareBones: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Geometric Comprehension in VLMs

arXiv 2604.10528 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable zero-shot recognition capabilities across a diverse spectrum of multimodal tasks, it yet remains an open question whether these architectures genuinely comprehend geometric structure or merely exploit RGB textures and contextual priors as statistical shortcuts. Existing evaluations fail to isolate this mechanism, conflating semantic reasoning with texture mapping and relying on imprecise annotations that inadvertently leak environmental cues. To address this gap, we introduce BareBones, a zero-shot benchmark designed to stress-test pure geometric shape comprehension. We curate pixel-level silhouettes of geometrically distinct classes across six datasets: five established segmentation sources (ImageNet-S, DIS5K, ThinObject5K, PASCAL VOC, CUB-200) and our novel flagship collection, WTP-Bench, establishing a noise-free geometric taxonomy. WTP-Bench is an extreme, fine-grained visual puzzle that forces models to identify inter-class geometric concepts from boundary contours alone. Our evaluation of 26 state-of-the-art proprietary and open-weight VLMs (eg. GPT-4.1, Gemini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, LLaVA) reveals a consistent, severe performance collapse under RGB deprivation, a phenomenon we term the textitTexture Bias Cliff. By documenting universal structural blindspots, BareBones establishes a rigorous yardstick for genuine geometric grounding. Project Page: https://eternal-f1ame.github.io/WTP-Bench/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  7. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  8. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  10. 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 929
  11. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  12. 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfercited by 679
4 more
  1. 2025SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal modelscited by 226
  2. 2022Highly Accurate Dichotomous Image Segmentationcited by 110
  3. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  4. 2025Re:Verse -- Can Your VLM Read a Manga?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 20253D-PointZshotS: Geometry-Aware 3D Point Cloud Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentation Narrowing the Visual-Semantic Gap
  2. 2023Zero-Shot 3D Shape Correspondence
  3. 2026Semantic Richness or Geometric Reasoning? The Fragility of VLM's Visual Invariance
  4. 2025CapGeo-Bench: Decoupling Visual Perception from Reasoning and Evaluating Geometric Understanding
  5. 2023Delving into Shape-aware Zero-shot Semantic Segmentation
  6. 2023Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificity
  7. 2026Groundbench: Multi-Resolution Polygon Grounding Exposes the Geometry Gap in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024VisOnlyQA: Large Vision Language Models Still Struggle with Visual Perception of Geometric Information