Instruction Data Selection via Answer Divergence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning relies on large instruction-response corpora whose quality and composition strongly affect downstream performance. We propose Answer Divergence-Guided Selection (ADG), which selects instruction data based on the geometric structure of multi-sample outputs. ADG draws several high-temperature generations per instruction, maps responses into an embedding space, and computes an output divergence score that jointly encodes dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy. High scores correspond to instructions whose answers are both far apart and multi-modal, rather than clustered paraphrases along a single direction. Across two backbones and three public instruction pools, fine-tuning on only 10K ADG-selected examples consistently outperforms strong selectors on six benchmarks spanning reasoning, knowledge, and coding. Analyses further show that both dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy are necessary, supporting answer divergence as a practical signal for instruction data selection. Code and appendix are included in the supplementary materials.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.
Builds on
27 of 37 references.
References · 27
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
15 more
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 77
- 2024Entropy Law: The Story Behind Data Compression and LLM Performancecited by 44
- 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
- 2024Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Modelscited by 32
- 2026FinCARDS: Card-Based Analyst Reranking for Financial Document Question Answeringcited by 16
- 2024Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025MIG: Automatic Data Selection for Instruction Tuning by Maximizing Information Gain in Semantic Spacecited by 12
- 2026Data Selection for Multi-turn Dialogue Instruction Tuningcited by 4
- 2025Evaluating Generalization and Representation Stability in Small LMs via Prompting, Fine-Tuning and Out-of-Distribution Promptscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Beyond Semantic Relevance: Counterfactual Risk Minimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026Generating Effective CoT Traces for Mitigating Causal Hallucinationcited by 0
- 2026Chain of Evidence: Pixel-Level Visual Attribution for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Semantic Relevance: Counterfactual Risk Minimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation2 May 2026
- 2026Chain of Evidence: Pixel-Level Visual Attribution for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation2 May 2026
- 2026Generating Effective CoT Traces for Mitigating Causal Hallucination14 Apr 2026