Generating Effective CoT Traces for Mitigating Causal Hallucination
On the map: LLM reasoning → Hallucination detection and mitigation
Abstract (arXiv)
Although large language models (LLMs) excel in complex reasoning tasks, they suffer from severe causal hallucination in event causality identification (ECI), particularly in smaller models (≤1.5B parameters). A promising approach to address this issue is to fine-tune them with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces. However, there is currently a lack of CoT trace dataset available for ECI. In this paper, we first investigate the essential criteria that effective CoT traces should possess to mitigate causal hallucination in smaller models. We then design a pipeline to generate CoT traces that meet these criteria. Moreover, since there is currently no metric for quantifying causal hallucination, we also introduce a new metric, the Causal Hallucination Rate (CHR), to quantify causal hallucination, guide the formulation of effective CoT trace criteria, and validate the effectiveness of our pipeline. Our experiments show that fine-tuning with the CoT traces generated by our pipeline not only substantially reduces causal hallucination in smaller LLMs but also improves mean accuracy. Moreover, the fine-tuned models exhibit strong cross-dataset and cross-difficulty generalization, as well as robustness under misleading intervention prompts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.
Builds on
7 of 15 references.
References · 7
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2025Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong Reasonerscited by 113
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Causal Reasoner? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 69
- 2025The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fitcited by 52
- 2024A Survey of Event Causality Identification: Taxonomy, Challenges, Assessment, and Prospectscited by 6
- 2026Data Selection for Multi-turn Dialogue Instruction Tuningcited by 4
- 2026Instruction Data Selection via Answer Divergencecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2026CausalGaze: Unveiling Hallucinations via Counterfactual Graph Intervention in Large Language Models
- 2024A Novel Approach to Eliminating Hallucinations in Large Language Model-Assisted Causal Discovery
- 2026Streaming Hallucination Detection in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation
- 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal Reasoning
- 2025Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models
- 2025CausalGuard: A Smart System for Detecting and Preventing False Information in Large Language Models