mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Modern Object Detectors for Robust Apple Detection in Orchard Imagery

arXiv 2604.09996 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate apple detection in orchard images is important for yield prediction, fruit counting, robotic harvesting, and crop monitoring. However, changing illumination, leaf clutter, dense fruit clusters, and partial occlusion make detection difficult. To provide a fair and reproducible comparison, this study establishes a controlled benchmark for single-class apple detection on the public AppleBBCH81 dataset using one deterministic train, validation, and test split and a unified evaluation protocol across six representative detectors: YOLOv10n, YOLO11n, RT-DETR-L, Faster R-CNN (ResNet50-FPN), FCOS (ResNet50-FPN), and SSDLite320 (MobileNetV3-Large). Performance is evaluated primarily using COCO-style [email protected] and [email protected]:0.95, and threshold-dependent behavior is further analyzed using precision-recall curves and fixed-threshold precision, recall, and F1-score at IoU = 0.5. On the validation split, YOLO11n achieves the best strict localization performance with [email protected]:0.95 = 0.6065 and [email protected] = 0.9620, followed closely by RT-DETR-L and YOLOv10n. At a fixed operating point with confidence >= 0.05, YOLOv10n attains the highest F1-score, whereas RT-DETR-L achieves very high recall but low precision because of many false positives at low confidence. These findings show that detector selection for orchard deployment should be guided not only by localization-aware accuracy but also by threshold robustness and the requirements of the downstream task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  7. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  8. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
  9. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  10. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,577
  11. 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 533
  12. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 515
3 more
  1. 2019MinneApple: A Benchmark Dataset for Apple Detection and Segmentationcited by 39
  2. 2016Deep Fruit Detection in Orchardscited by 38
  3. 2018A Comparative Study of Fruit Detection and Counting Methods for Yield Mapping in Apple Orchardscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.