mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Fruit Detection and Counting Methods for Yield Mapping in Apple Orchards

arXiv 1810.09499 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2018cs.CV cs.ROcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present new methods for apple detection and counting based on recent deep learning approaches and compare them with state-of-the-art results based on classical methods. Our goal is to quantify performance improvements by neural network-based methods compared to methods based on classical approaches. Additionally, we introduce a complete system for counting apples in an entire row. This task is challenging as it requires tracking fruits in images from both sides of the row. We evaluate the performances of three fruit detection methods and two fruit counting methods on six datasets. Results indicate that the classical detection approach still outperforms the deep learning based methods in the majority of the datasets. For fruit counting though, the deep learning based approach performs better for all of the datasets. Combining the classical detection method together with the neural network based counting approach, we achieve remarkable yield accuracies ranging from 95.56% to 97.83%.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: