Noise-Aware In-Context Learning for Hallucination Mitigation in ALLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Auditory large language models (ALLMs) have demonstrated strong general capabilities in audio understanding and reasoning tasks. However, their reliability is still undermined by hallucination issues. Existing hallucination evaluation methods are formulated as binary classification tasks, which are insufficient to characterize the more complex hallucination patterns that arise in generative tasks. Moreover, current hallucination mitigation strategies rely on fine-tuning, resulting in high computational costs. To address the above limitations, we propose a plug-and-play Noise-Aware In-Context Learning (NAICL) method. Specifically, we construct a noise prior library, retrieve noise examples relevant to the input audio, and incorporate them as contextual priors, thereby guiding the model to reduce speculative associations when acoustic evidence is insufficient and to adopt a more conservative generation strategy. In addition, we establish a hallucination benchmark for audio caption tasks including the construction of the Clotho-1K multi-event benchmark dataset, the definition of four types of auditory hallucinations, and the introduction of metrics such as hallucination type distribution to support fine-grained analysis. Experimental results show that all evaluated ALLMs exhibit same hallucination behaviors. Moreover, the proposed NAICL method reduces the overall hallucination rate from 26.53% to 16.98%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
24 of 29 references.
References · 24
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 704
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
- 2023Qwen-Audio: Advancing Universal Audio Understanding via Unified Large-Scale Audio-Language Modelscited by 591
- 2024Qwen2-Audio Technical Reportcited by 543
- 2023SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language Modelscited by 492
12 more
- 2022BEATs: Audio Pre-Training with Acoustic Tokenizerscited by 378
- 2023Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Modelscited by 254
- 2025Kimi-Audio Technical Reportcited by 210
- 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Modelscited by 210
- 2025Qwen2.5-1M Technical Reportcited by 158
- 2024AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2025Step-Audio 2 Technical Reportcited by 101
- 2025MiMo-Audio: Audio Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 58
- 2024Understanding Sounds, Missing the Questions: The Challenge of Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 30
- 2024Can Large Audio-Language Models Truly Hear? Tackling Hallucinations with Multi-Task Assessment and Stepwise Audio Reasoningcited by 29
- 2025Towards Reliable Large Audio Language Modelcited by 3
- 2025Mechanism of Task-oriented Information Removal in In-context Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.