mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Lingual Attention Distillation with Personality-Informed Generative Augmentation for Multilingual Personality Recognition

arXiv 2604.08851 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While significant work has been done on personality recognition, the lack of multilingual datasets remains an unresolved challenge. To address this, we propose ADAM (Cross-Lingual (A)ttention (D)istillation with Personality-Guided Generative (A)ugmentation for (M)ultilingual Personality Recognition), a state-of-the-art approach designed to advance multilingual personality recognition. Our approach leverages an existing English-language personality dataset as the primary source and employs a large language model (LLM) for translationbased augmentation, enhanced by Personality-Informed Generative Augmentation (PIGA), to generate high-quality training data in multiple languages, including Japanese, Chinese, Malay, and French. We provide a thorough analysis to justify the effectiveness of these augmentation techniques. Building on these advancements, ADAM integrates Cross-Lingual Attention Distillation (CLAD) to train a model capable of understanding and recognizing personality traits across languages, bridging linguistic and cultural gaps in personality analysis. This research presents a thorough evaluation of the proposed augmentation method, incorporating an ablation study on recognition performance to ensure fair comparisons and robust validation. Overall, with PIGA augmentation, the findings demonstrate that CLAD significantly outperforms the standard BCE across all languages and personality traits, achieving notable improvements in average BA scores - 0.6332 (+0.0573) on the Essays dataset and 0.7448 (+0.0968) on the Kaggle dataset. The CLAD-trained model also demonstrated strong generalizability and achieved benchmark performance comparable to current leading encoder models. The model weight, dataset, and algorithm repository are available at https://research.jingjietan.com/?q=ADAM.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

Builds on

21 of 59 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  4. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  5. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 431
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  7. 2022Decoupled Knowledge Distillationcited by 388
  8. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
  9. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 177
  10. 2025EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representationscited by 139
  11. 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 96
  12. 2023Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Frameworkcited by 70
9 more
  1. 2023Enhancing Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models through Logiccited by 35
  2. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Personality Recognizer? A Preliminary Studycited by 26
  3. 2024Efficient Solutions For An Intriguing Failure of LLMs: Long Context Window Does Not Mean LLMs Can Analyze Long Sequences Flawlesslycited by 24
  4. 2024GPT-4 vs. Human Translators: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Translation Quality Across Languages, Domains, and Expertise Levelscited by 21
  5. 2024Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Modelscited by 11
  6. 2024Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactionscited by 8
  7. 2024EERPD: Leveraging Emotion and Emotion Regulation for Improving Personality Detectioncited by 7
  8. 2024Can Students Beyond The Teacher? Distilling Knowledge from Teacher's Biascited by 7
  9. 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Code-Mixed Data Augmentation in Sentiment Analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.