mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Fine-Tuning Changes the Evidence: Architecture-Dependent Semantic Drift in Chest X-Ray Explanations

arXiv 2604.08513 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transfer learning followed by fine-tuning is widely adopted in medical image classification due to consistent gains in diagnostic performance. However, in multi-class settings with overlapping visual features, improvements in accuracy do not guarantee stability of the visual evidence used to support predictions. We define semantic drift as systematic changes in the attribution structure supporting a model's predictions between transfer learning and full fine-tuning, reflecting potential shifts in underlying visual reasoning despite stable classification performance. Using a five-class chest X-ray task, we evaluate DenseNet201, ResNet50V2, and InceptionV3 under a two-stage training protocol and quantify drift with reference-free metrics capturing spatial localization and structural consistency of attribution maps. Across architectures, coarse anatomical localization remains stable, while overlap IoU reveals pronounced architecture-dependent reorganization of evidential structure. Beyond single-method analysis, stability rankings can reverse across LayerCAM and GradCAM++ under converged predictive performance, establishing explanation stability as an interaction between architecture, optimization phase, and attribution objective.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

10 of 13 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  3. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  4. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  5. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  6. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  7. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  8. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
  9. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
  10. 2023The Meta-Evaluation Problem in Explainable AI: Identifying Reliable Estimators with MetaQuantuscited by 37

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rethinking Visual Attribution for Chest X-ray Reasoning in Large Vision Language Models
  2. 2026Enhancing Visual Reasoning in Chest X-Ray Report Generation Using Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Does Vision-Language Pretraining Granularity Matter? A Controlled Evaluation of Vision-Language Objectives Across Chest X-Ray Interpretation Tasks
  4. 2026Quantifying Explanation Consistency: The C-Score Metric for CAM-Based Explainability in Medical Image Classification
  5. 2025XBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual-Language Explanations in Chest Radiography
  6. 2025Eyes on the Image: Gaze Supervised Multimodal Learning for Chest X-ray Diagnosis and Report Generation
  7. 2025Reasoning Visual Language Model for Chest X-Ray Analysis
  8. 2026MC-CXR: A Multi-Context Chest X-ray Benchmark for Context-Induced Disruption in Vision-Language Models