mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dynamic Attentional Context Scoping: Agent-Triggered Focus Sessions for Isolated Per-Agent Steering in Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration

arXiv 2604.07911 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent LLM orchestration systems suffer from context pollution: when N concurrent agents compete for the orchestrator's context window, each agent's task state, partial outputs, and pending questions contaminate the steering interactions of every other agent, degrading decision quality. We introduce Dynamic Attentional Context Scoping (DACS), a mechanism in which the orchestrator operates in two asymmetric modes. In Registry mode it holds only lightweight per-agent status summaries (<=200 tokens each), remaining responsive to all agents and the user. When an agent emits a SteeringRequest, the orchestrator enters Focus(a_i) mode, injecting the full context of agent a_i while compressing all other agents to their registry entries. Context isolation is agent-triggered, asymmetric, and deterministic: the context window contains exactly F(a_i) + R_{-i} during steering, eliminating cross-agent contamination without requiring context compression or retrieval. We evaluate DACS across four experimental phases totalling 200 trials: Phase 1 tests N in {3,5,10} (60 trials); Phase 2 tests agent heterogeneity and adversarial dependencies (60 trials); Phase 3 tests decision density up to D=15 (40 trials); Phase 4 uses autonomous LLM agents for free-form questions (40 trials, Claude Haiku 4.5). Across all 8 synthetic scenarios, DACS achieves 90.0--98.4% steering accuracy versus 21.0--60.0% for a flat-context baseline (p < 0.0001 throughout), with wrong-agent contamination falling from 28--57% to 0--14% and context efficiency ratios of up to 3.53x. The accuracy advantage grows with N and D; keyword matching is validated by LLM-as-judge across all phases (mean kappa=0.909). DACS outperforms the flat-context baseline by +17.2pp at N=3 (p=0.0023) and +20.4pp at N=5 (p=0.0008) in Phase 4, with the advantage growing with N confirmed by two independent judges.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

8 of 15 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AdaptOrch: Task-Adaptive Multi-Agent Orchestration in the Era of LLM Performance Convergence18 Feb
  2. 2026Lemon Agent Technical Report6 Feb
  3. 2026Adaptive Orchestration: Scalable Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems10 Jan
  4. 2025AgentOrchestra: Orchestrating Multi-Agent Intelligence with the Tool-Environment-Agent(TEA) Protocol14 Jun

Other references · 4

  1. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 349
  2. 2026SideQuest: Model-Driven KV Cache Management for Long-Horizon Agentic Reasoningcited by 10
  3. 2025Adaptive Focus Memory for Language Modelscited by 6
  4. 2026CodeDelegator: Mitigating Context Pollution via Role Separation in Code-as-Action Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Enhancing Multi-Agent Communication through Attention Steering with Context Relevance
  2. 2026Focus Is All You Need: Adaptive Goal-aware Attention Orchestration for Multi-Agent Graph Systems
  3. 2026PerspectiveGap: A Benchmark for Multi-Agent Orchestration Prompting
  4. 2025Orchestrator: Active Inference for Multi-Agent Systems in Long-Horizon Tasks
  5. 2026LongSeeker: Elastic Context Orchestration for Long-Horizon Search Agents
  6. 2026Orchestra-o1: Omnimodal Agent Orchestration
  7. 2025The Complexity Trap: Simple Observation Masking Is as Efficient as LLM Summarization for Agent Context Management
  8. 2026From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design