mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLM-Generated Fault Scenarios for Evaluating Perception-Driven Lane Following in Autonomous Edge Systems

arXiv 2604.07362 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying autonomous vision systems on edge devices faces a critical challenge: resource constraints prevent real-time and predictable execution of comprehensive safety tests. Existing validation methods depend on static datasets or manual fault injection, failing to capture the diverse environmental hazards encountered in real-world deployment. To address this, we introduce a decoupled offline-online fault injection framework. This architecture separates the validation process into two distinct phases: a computationally intensive Offline Phase and a lightweight Online Phase. In the offline phase, we employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to semantically generate structured fault scenarios and Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) to synthesize high-fidelity sensor degradations. These complex fault dynamics are distilled into a pre-computed lookup table, enabling the edge device to perform real-time fault-aware inference without running heavy AI models locally. We extensively validated this framework on a ResNet18 lane-following model across 460 fault scenarios. Results show that while the model achieves a baseline R^2 of approximately 0.85 on clean data, our generated faults expose significant robustness degradation, with RMSE increasing by up to 99% and within-0.10 localization accuracy dropping to as low as 31.0% under fog conditions, demonstrating the inadequacy of normal-data evaluation for real-world edge AI deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 9 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  4. 2025LLM-attacker: Enhancing Closed-loop Adversarial Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving with Large Language Modelscited by 19
  5. 2024LanEvil: Benchmarking the Robustness of Lane Detection to Environmental Illusionscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hardware Utilization and Inference Performance of Edge Object Detection Under Fault Injection
  2. 2026Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMs
  3. 2025LightEMMA: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving
  4. 2026Auditing Latent-Space Monitors for Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Benchmarking the Robustness of Autonomous Driving to Environmental Illusions: A Lane Perception Perspective
  6. 2025INSIGHT: Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety through Vision-Language Models on Context-Aware Hazard Detection and Edge Case Evaluation
  7. 2025AutoMT: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Automated Metamorphic Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
  8. 2026Risk-Adaptive Edge--Cloud Visual Reasoning for Communication-Efficient Autonomous Driving