mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dialogues with AI Reduce Beliefs in Misinformation but Build No Lasting Discernment Skills

arXiv 2510.01537 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the growing prevalence of fake information, including increasingly realistic AI-generated news, there is an urgent need to train people to better evaluate and detect misinformation. While interactions with AI have been shown to durably reduce people's beliefs in false information, it is unclear whether these interactions also teach people the skills to discern false information themselves. We conducted a month-long study where 67 participants classified news headline-image pairs as real or fake, discussed their assessments with an AI system, followed by an unassisted evaluation of unseen news items to measure accuracy before, during, and after AI assistance. While AI assistance produced immediate improvements during AI-assisted sessions (+21% average), participants' unassisted performance on new items declined significantly by 15.3% in week 4 compared to week 0. These results indicate that while AI may help immediately, it ultimately degrades long-term misinformation detection abilities

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.