From Incomplete Architecture to Quantified Risk: Multimodal LLM-Driven Security Assessment for Cyber-Physical Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cyber-physical systems often contend with incomplete architectural documentation or outdated information resulting from legacy technologies, knowledge management gaps, and the complexity of integrating diverse subsystems over extended operational lifecycles. This architectural incompleteness impedes reliable security assessment, as inaccurate or missing architectural knowledge limits the identification of system dependencies, attack surfaces, and risk propagation pathways. To address this foundational challenge, this paper introduces ASTRAL (Architecture-Centric Security Threat Risk Assessment using LLMs), an architecture-centric security assessment technique implemented in a prototype tool powered by multimodal LLMs. The proposed approach assists practitioners in reconstructing and analysing CPS architectures when documentation is fragmented or absent. By leveraging prompt chaining, few-shot learning, and architectural reasoning, ASTRAL extracts and synthesises system representations from disparate data sources. By integrating LLM reasoning with architectural modelling, our approach supports adaptive threat identification and quantitative risk estimation for cyber-physical systems. We evaluated the approach through an ablation study across multiple CPS case studies and an expert evaluation involving 14 experienced cybersecurity practitioners. Practitioner feedback suggests that ASTRAL is useful and reliable for supporting architecture-centric security assessment. Overall, the results indicate that the approach can support more informed cyber risk management decisions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.
Builds on
14 of 57 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 65
- 2019Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)cited by 21
- 2024Prompt Chaining or Stepwise Prompt? Refinement in Text Summarizationcited by 16
- 2024ThreatModeling-LLM: Automating Threat Modeling using Large Language Models for Banking Systemcited by 10
- 2025Exploring the Role of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Surveycited by 5
- 2018A methodology to Evaluate the Usability of Security APIscited by 2
- 2024Security Modelling for Cyber-Physical Systems: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 2
- 2020Fundamental Challenges of Cyber-Physical Systems Security Modelingcited by 1
- 2024ACTISM: Threat-informed Dynamic Security Modelling for Automotive Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2026From Requirements to Attack Trees: Grounded LLM Agents for Design-Time Security Review
- 2025A Large Language Model-Supported Threat Modeling Framework for Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems
- 2026Structured but Fragile: On the Limits of LLMs in Cybersecurity Decision-Making
- 2026Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Study
- 2025Leveraging Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment -- A Case from Forestry Cyber-Physical Systems
- 2025Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms
- 2025LLMpatronous: Harnessing the Power of LLMs For Vulnerability Detection