mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Large Language Model-Supported Threat Modeling Framework for Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2506.00831 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing threat modeling frameworks related to transportation cyber-physical systems (CPS) are often narrow in scope, labor-intensive, and require substantial cybersecurity expertise. To this end, we introduce the Transportation Cybersecurity and Resiliency Threat Modeling Framework (TraCR-TMF), a large language model (LLM)-based threat modeling framework for transportation CPS that requires limited cybersecurity expert intervention. TraCR-TMF identifies threats, potential attack techniques, and relevant countermeasures for transportation CPS. Three LLM-based approaches support these identifications: (i) a retrieval-augmented generation approach requiring no cybersecurity expert intervention, (ii) an in-context learning approach with low expert intervention, and (iii) a supervised fine-tuning approach with moderate expert intervention. TraCR-TMF offers LLM-based attack path identification for critical assets based on vulnerabilities across transportation CPS entities. Additionally, it incorporates the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) scores of known exploited vulnerabilities to prioritize threat mitigations. The framework was evaluated through two cases. First, the framework identified relevant attack techniques for various transportation CPS applications, 73% of which were validated by cybersecurity experts as correct. Second, the framework was used to identify attack paths for a target asset in a real-world cyberattack incident. TraCR-TMF successfully predicted exploitations, like lateral movement of adversaries, data exfiltration, and data encryption for ransomware, as reported in the incident. These findings show the efficacy of TraCR-TMF in transportation CPS threat modeling, while reducing the need for extensive involvement of cybersecurity experts. To facilitate real-world adoptions, all our codes are shared via an open-source repository.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.

Builds on

5 of 79 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  4. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  5. 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 79

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Exploring Traffic Simulation and Cybersecurity Strategies Using Large Language Models
  2. 2026Evaluating Open-Weight LLMs for Generating Structured Threat Information for Autonomous Vehicle Vulnerabilities
  3. 2025Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques
  4. 2023Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation
  5. 2026From Incomplete Architecture to Quantified Risk: Multimodal LLM-Driven Security Assessment for Cyber-Physical Systems
  6. 2025Transportation Cyber Incident Awareness through Generative AI-Based Incident Analysis and Retrieval-Augmented Question-Answering Systems
  7. 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence
  8. 2026GARAGE: Characterizing the Automation Boundary in LLM-based Attack Graph Generation ↗