MA-IDS: Multi-Agent RAG Framework for IoT Network Intrusion Detection with an Experience Library
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) face important limitations. Signature-based methods are effective for known attack patterns, but they struggle to detect zero-day attacks and often miss modified variants of previously known attacks, while many machine learning approaches offer limited interpretability. These challenges become even more severe in IoT environments because of resource constraints and heterogeneous protocols. To address these issues, we propose MA-IDS, a Multi-Agent Intrusion Detection System that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for reasoning-driven intrusion detection. The proposed framework grounds LLM reasoning through a persistent, self-building Experience Library. Two specialized agents collaborate through a FAISS-based vector database: a Traffic Classification Agent that retrieves past error rules before each inference, and an Error Analysis Agent that converts misclassifications into human-readable detection rules stored for future retrieval, enabling continual learning through external knowledge accumulation, without modifying the underlying language model. Evaluated on NF-BoT-IoT and NF-ToN-IoT benchmark datasets, MA-IDS achieves Macro F1-Scores of 89.75% and 85.22%, improving over zero-shot baselines of 17% and 4.96% by more than 72 and 80 percentage points. These results are competitive with SVM while providing rule-level explanations for every classification decision, demonstrating that retrieval-augmented reasoning offers a principled path toward explainable, self-improving intrusion detection for IoT networks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 4
- 2024Large Language Models in Wireless Application Design: In-Context Learning-enhanced Automatic Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 16
- 2023Machine Learning Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Applicationscited by 4
- 2025Large Language Models for Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Foundations, Implementations, and Future Directionscited by 4
- 2025Deep Learning-based Intrusion Detection Systems: A Surveycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025An LLM-Powered AI Agent Framework for Holistic IoT Traffic Interpretation
- 2026Rethinking On-Device LLM Reasoning: Why Analogical Mapping Outperforms Abstract Thinking for IoT DDoS Detection ↗
- 2025CyberRAG: An Agentic RAG cyber attack classification and reporting tool
- 2026Multi-Agent Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Low-Altitude Economy IoT: An LLM-Enhanced Agentic AI Framework
- 2025LLM-based Multi-class Attack Analysis and Mitigation Framework in IoT/IIoT Networks
- 2026Lightweight LLMs for Network Attack Detection in IoT Networks ↗
- 2026Argus: Reorchestrating Static Analysis via a Multi-Agent Ensemble for Full-Chain Security Vulnerability Detection
- 2025RAG-targeted Adversarial Attack on LLM-based Threat Detection and Mitigation Framework