mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Nidus: Externalized Reasoning for AI-Assisted Engineering

arXiv 2604.05080 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.LOcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

We present Nidus, a governance runtime that mechanizes the V-model for AI-assisted software delivery. In the self-hosting deployment, three LLM families (Claude, Gemini, Codex) delivered a 100,000-line system under proof obligations verified against the current obligation set on every commit. The system governed its own construction. Engineering invariants - traced requirements, justified architecture, evidenced deliveries - cannot be reliably maintained as learned behavior; assurance requires enforcement by a mechanism external to the proposer. Nidus externalizes the engineering methodology into a decidable artifact verified on every mutation before persistence. Organizational standards compile into guidebooks - constraint libraries imported by governed projects and enforced by decidable evaluation. Four contributions: (1) recursive self-governance - the constraint surface constrains mutations to itself; (2) stigmergic coordination - friction from the surface routes agents without central control; (3) proximal spec reinforcement - the living artifact externalizes the engineering context that RL and long-chain reasoning try to internalize; the specification is the reward function, UNSAT verdicts shape behavior at inference time, no weight updates; (4) governance theater prevention - compliance evidence cannot be fabricated within the modeled mutation path. The constraint surface compounds: each obligation permanently eliminates a class of unengineered output. The artifact's development history is a formal development - every state satisfies all active obligations, and the obligation set grows monotonically.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  2. 2024Large Language Models Can Solve Real-World Planning Rigorously with Formal Verification Toolscited by 47
  3. 2024Laurel: Unblocking Automated Verification with Large Language Modelscited by 10
  4. 2024Lost in Translation: Latent Concept Misalignment in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Model-Based Agentic Software Engineering
  2. 2026Harness as an Asset: Enforcing Determinism via the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF)
  3. 2026Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks
  4. 2026Grounding SWE-Agent Decisions in Architecture-0 Design: Navigating Unknown Unknowns through Physical Mapping
  5. 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governance
  6. 2025Interacting with AI Reasoning Models: Harnessing "Thoughts" for AI-Driven Software Engineering
  7. 2026Is Agentic AI Ready for Real-World Hardware Engineering? A Deep Dive with Phoenix-bench
  8. 2026The Spec Growth Engine: Spec-Anchored, Code-Coupled, Drift-Enforced Architecture for AI-Assisted Software Development