mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harness as an Asset: Enforcing Determinism via the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF)

arXiv 2604.17025 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models produce a controllability gap in safety-critical engineering: even low rates of undetected constraint violations render a system undeployable. Current orchestration paradigms suffer from sycophantic compliance, context attention decay, and stochastic oscillation during self-correction. We introduce the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF), which transitions agentic workflows from open-loop generation to closed-loop fail-safe determinism via three pillars: (1) Recursive Atomic Decomposition with physical context firewalls; (2) Harness as an Asset, formalizing domain invariants into machine-readable registries enforced by a deterministic Unified Assertion Interface; and (3) Structured Semantic Gradients with State Locking for monotonic non-regression. This paper makes two core claims. First, an industrialization thesis: once domain invariants are formalized as an executable Harness, the Harness itself becomes a first-class enterprise asset that compounds in value as foundation models commoditize, and CAAF's ability to deliver its reliability on commodity-tier models makes fully self-hosted, on-premises deployment architecturally feasible for regulated sectors where cloud APIs are not an option. Second, an architectural claim supported by ablation: CAAF's three pillars address complementary failure surfaces and none alone closes the controllability gap at commodity cost. The paper contributes entirely at the orchestration and industrialization layer. Evidence across two complementary benchmarks, three-tier UAI ablations, multi-agent baselines, and a closed-source commodity family replicated by two independent open-weight families, is reported in the body.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

29 of 49 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  7. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  8. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  9. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  10. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  11. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
  12. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
17 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  2. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
  3. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  4. 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 449
  5. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  6. 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 250
  7. 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 248
  8. 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 192
  9. 2025Recursive Language Modelscited by 94
  10. 2024Trace is the Next AutoDiff: Generative Optimization with Rich Feedback, Execution Traces, and LLMscited by 62
  11. 2025Enforcing Temporal Constraints for LLM Agentscited by 31
  12. 2023DSPy Assertions: Computational Constraints for Self-Refining Language Model Pipelinescited by 27
  13. 2025Blueprint First, Model Second: A Framework for Deterministic LLM Workflowcited by 11
  14. 2025A Mathematical Framework for AI Singularity: Conditions, Bounds, and Control of Recursive Improvementcited by 5
  15. 2025Metamodel-Guided Model Generation with Layered Constraintscited by 3
  16. 2026A Lightweight Modular Framework for Constructing Autonomous Agents Driven by Large Language Models: Design, Implementation, and Applications in AgentForgecited by 3
  17. 2026Enforcing Monotonic Progress in Legal Cross-Examination: Preventing Long-Horizon Stagnation in LLM-Based Inquirycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Harness Engineering for Predictable Agentic Systems: An Empirical Study of Deterministic Execution Constraints
  2. 2026Harness Engineering as Categorical Architecture
  3. 2026The Empire, Long Divided, Must Unite: Architectural Convergence in Three LLM Agent Harnesses
  4. 2026ClayBuddy: A Framework, Evaluation, & Mitigation of Coding Agent Failures
  5. 2026From Model Scaling to System Scaling: Scaling the Harness in Agentic AI
  6. 2026AI Harness Engineering: A Runtime Substrate for Foundation-Model Software Agents
  7. 2026HERA: Harness-Environment Co-Evolution for Reliable Agentic Abstention
  8. 2026Grow the Harness, Not the Context: From Strategy-Free Scaffolds to Reusable Specialist Agents