mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inclusion-of-Thoughts: Mitigating Preference Instability via Purifying the Decision Space

arXiv 2604.04944 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used to evaluate large language models (LLMs). However, LLMs remain vulnerable to the presence of plausible distractors. This often diverts attention toward irrelevant choices, resulting in unstable oscillation between correct and incorrect answers. In this paper, we propose Inclusion-of-Thoughts (IoT), a progressive self-filtering strategy that is designed to mitigate this cognitive load (i.e., instability of model preferences under the presence of distractors) and enable the model to focus more effectively on plausible answers. Our method operates to reconstruct the MCQ using only plausible option choices, providing a controlled setting for examining comparative judgements and therefore the stability of the model's internal reasoning under perturbation. By explicitly documenting this filtering process, IoT also enhances the transparency and interpretability of the model's decision-making. Extensive empirical evaluation demonstrates that IoT substantially boosts chain-of-thought performance across a range of arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, and educational benchmarks with minimal computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023POE: Process of Elimination for Multiple Choice Reasoning24 Oct
  2. 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought3 Oct

Other references · 20

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  7. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  10. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
  11. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 650
  12. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
8 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
  2. 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
  3. 2019NumNet: Machine Reading Comprehension with Numerical Reasoningcited by 59
  4. 2019Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehensioncited by 51
  5. 2023RCOT: Detecting and Rectifying Factual Inconsistency in Reasoning by Reversing Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 47
  6. 2023Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Expertscited by 43
  7. 2019SocialIQA: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactionscited by 37
  8. 2021Measuring and Improving BERT's Mathematical Abilities by Predicting the Order of Reasoningcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025None of the Above, Less of the Right: Parallel Patterns between Humans and LLMs on Multi-Choice Questions Answering
  2. 2025Test-Time Reasoners Are Strategic Multiple-Choice Test-Takers
  3. 2023It's Not Easy Being Wrong: Large Language Models Struggle with Process of Elimination Reasoning
  4. 2025Reasoning Models are Test Exploiters: Rethinking Multiple-Choice
  5. 2026When Models Decide and When They Bind: A Two-Stage Computation for Multiple-Choice Question-Answering
  6. 2024RATT: A Thought Structure for Coherent and Correct LLM Reasoning
  7. 2024Mitigating Misleading Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Selective Filtering
  8. 2024DCR: Divide-and-Conquer Reasoning for Multi-choice Question Answering with LLMs