mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Formal Constraints on Dependency Syntax

arXiv 2604.04542 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dependency syntax represents the structure of a sentence as a tree composed of dependencies, i.e., directed relations between lexical units. While in its more general form any such tree is allowed, in practice many are not plausible or are very infrequent in attested language. This has motivated a search for constraints characterizing subsets of trees that better fit real linguistic phenomena, providing a more accurate linguistic description, faster parsing or insights on language evolution and human processing. Projectivity is the most well-studied such constraint, but it has been shown to be too restrictive to represent some linguistic phenomena, especially in flexible-word-order languages. Thus, a variety of constraints have been proposed to seek a realistic middle ground between the limitations of projectivity and the excessive leniency of unrestricted dependency structures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.

Builds on

14 of 54 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  2. 2019Viable Dependency Parsing as Sequence Labelingcited by 34
  3. 2019Left-to-Right Dependency Parsing with Pointer Networkscited by 21
  4. 2020The optimality of syntactic dependency distancescited by 15
  5. 2020Bracketing Encodings for 2-Planar Dependency Parsingcited by 15
  6. 2020Span-based discontinuous constituency parsing: a family of exact chart-based algorithms with time complexities from O(n^6) down to O(n^3)cited by 11
  7. 2020Prague Dependency Treebank -- Consolidated 1.0cited by 11
  8. 20234 and 7-bit Labeling for Projective and Non-Projective Dependency Treescited by 8
  9. 2017Are crossing dependencies really scarce?cited by 7
  10. 2019Memory limitations are hidden in grammarcited by 6
  11. 2015Crossings as a side effect of dependency lengthscited by 3
  12. 2018Global Transition-based Non-projective Dependency Parsingcited by 3
2 more
  1. 2023Hexatagging: Projective Dependency Parsing as Taggingcited by 3
  2. 2018Improving Coverage and Runtime Complexity for Exact Inference in Non-Projective Transition-Based Dependency Parserscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.