Global Transition-based Non-projective Dependency Parsing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shi, Huang, and Lee (2017) obtained state-of-the-art results for English and Chinese dependency parsing by combining dynamic-programming implementations of transition-based dependency parsers with a minimal set of bidirectional LSTM features. However, their results were limited to projective parsing. In this paper, we extend their approach to support non-projectivity by providing the first practical implementation of the MH4 algorithm, an O(n4) mildly nonprojective dynamic-programming parser with very high coverage on non-projective treebanks. To make MH4 compatible with minimal transition-based feature sets, we introduce a transition-based interpretation of it in which parser items are mapped to sequences of transitions. We thus obtain the first implementation of global decoding for non-projective transition-based parsing, and demonstrate empirically that it is more effective than its projective counterpart in parsing a number of highly non-projective languages
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Headed-Span-Based Projective Dependency Parsingcited by 11
- 2023AutoAM: An End-To-End Neural Model for Automatic and Universal Argument Miningcited by 3
- 2026Formal Constraints on Dependency Syntaxcited by 0
- 2026Formal Constraints on Dependency Syntax6 Apr 2026
- 2023AutoAM: An End-To-End Neural Model for Automatic and Universal Argument Mining17 Sep 2023
- 2021Headed-Span-Based Projective Dependency Parsing10 Aug 2021