Commercial Persuasion in AI-Mediated Conversations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become a primary interface between users and the web, companies face growing economic incentives to embed commercial influence into AI-mediated conversations. We present two preregistered experiments (N = 2,012) in which participants selected a book to receive from a large eBook catalog using either a traditional search engine or a conversational LLM agent powered by one of five frontier models. Unbeknownst to participants, a fifth of all products were randomly designated as sponsored and promoted in different ways. We find that LLM-driven persuasion nearly triples the rate at which users select sponsored products compared to traditional search placement (61.2% vs. 22.4%), while the vast majority of participants fail to detect any promotional steering. Explicit "Sponsored" labels do not significantly reduce persuasion, and instructing the model to conceal its intent makes its influence nearly invisible (detection accuracy < 10%). Altogether, our results indicate that conversational AI can covertly redirect consumer choices at scale, and that existing transparency mechanisms may be insufficient to protect users.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Deep-Research Agents Can Be Poisoned via User-Generated Contentcited by 4
- 2026Generative AI Advertising as a Problem of Trustworthy Commercial Interventioncited by 1
- 2026TourMart: A Parametric Audit Instrument for Commission Steering in LLM Travel Agentscited by 0
- 2026AI Watchdog: Agent Interfaces for Detecting and Defending Against Manipulative Dark Patterns in AI Conversationscited by 0
- 2026Selective Elicitation as a Commercial Influence Channel: A Reproducible Synthetic Shopping-Agent Stress Testcited by 0
- 2026Selective Elicitation as a Commercial Influence Channel: A Reproducible Synthetic Shopping-Agent Stress Test29 Sep 2026
- 2026AI Watchdog: Agent Interfaces for Detecting and Defending Against Manipulative Dark Patterns in AI Conversations22 Aug 2026
- 2026Deep-Research Agents Can Be Poisoned via User-Generated Content22 May 2026
- 2026Generative AI Advertising as a Problem of Trustworthy Commercial Intervention18 May 2026
- 2026TourMart: A Parametric Audit Instrument for Commission Steering in LLM Travel Agents11 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders
- 2026LLM Consumer Behavior Theory: Foundations of a Novel Research Field
- 2025It's the Thought that Counts: Evaluating the Attempts of Frontier LLMs to Persuade on Harmful Topics
- 2026LLMAdBench: A Human Preference Benchmark for Advertising in LLM Responses
- 2025From Digital Distrust to Codified Honesty: Experimental Evidence on Generative AI in Credence Goods Markets ↗
- 2025Cite Before You Speak: Enhancing Context-Response Grounding in E-commerce Conversational LLM-Agents
- 2025Are Large Language Models Sensitive to the Motives Behind Communication?
- 2026When Agents Persuade: Rhetoric Generation and Mitigation in LLMs