mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cite Before You Speak: Enhancing Context-Response Grounding in E-commerce Conversational LLM-Agents

arXiv 2503.04830 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

With the advancement of conversational large language models (LLMs), several LLM-based Conversational Shopping Agents (CSA) have been developed to help customers smooth their online shopping. The primary objective in building an engaging and trustworthy CSA is to ensure the agent's responses about product factoids are accurate and factually grounded. However, two challenges remain. First, LLMs produce hallucinated or unsupported claims. Such inaccuracies risk spreading misinformation and diminishing customer trust. Second, without providing knowledge source attribution in CSA response, customers struggle to verify LLM-generated information. To address both challenges, we present an easily productionized solution that enables a ''citation experience'' to our customers. We build auto-evaluation metrics to holistically evaluate LLM's grounding and attribution capabilities, suggesting that citation generation paradigm substantially improves grounding performance by 13.83%. To deploy this capability at scale, we introduce Multi-UX-Inference system, which appends source citations to LLM outputs while preserving existing user experience features and supporting scalable inference. Large-scale online A/B tests show that grounded CSA responses improves customer engagement by 3% - 10%, depending on UX variations.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

Builds on

16 of 18 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  4. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  5. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  6. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  7. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
  8. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  9. 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
  10. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  11. 2024Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 92
  12. 2024LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-context QAcited by 78
4 more
  1. 2023Understanding Retrieval Augmentation for Long-Form Question Answeringcited by 45
  2. 2023Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generationcited by 44
  3. 2024Learning Fine-Grained Grounded Citations for Attributed Large Language Modelscited by 12
  4. 2024Large Language Models for Social Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024What should I wear to a party in a Greek taverna? Evaluation for Conversational Agents in the Fashion Domain
  2. 2026ProductResearch: Training E-Commerce Deep Research Agents via Multi-Agent Synthetic Trajectory Distillation
  3. 2026Shopping Reasoning Bench: An Expert-Authored Benchmark for Multi-Turn Conversational Shopping Assistants
  4. 2026Commercial Persuasion in AI-Mediated Conversations
  5. 2024AGENT-CQ: Automatic Generation and Evaluation of Clarifying Questions for Conversational Search with LLMs
  6. 2026ShopSimulator: Evaluating and Exploring RL-Driven LLM Agent for Shopping Assistants
  7. 2026Shopping Companion: Benchmarking and Training LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Preference-Grounded E-Commerce Tasks
  8. 2026You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding