LOCARD: An Agentic Framework for Blockchain Forensics
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Blockchain forensics inherently involves dynamic and iterative investigations, while many existing approaches primarily model it through static inference pipelines. We propose a paradigm shift towards Agentic Blockchain Forensics (ABF), modeling forensic investigation as a sequential decision-making process. To instantiate this paradigm, we introduce LOCARD, the first agentic framework for blockchain forensics. LOCARD operationalizes this perspective through a Tri-Core Cognitive Architecture that decouples strategic planning, operational execution, and evaluative validation. Unlike generic LLM-based agents, it incorporates a Structured Belief State mechanism to enforce forensic rigor and guide exploration under explicit state constraints. To demonstrate the efficacy of the ABF paradigm, we apply LOCARD to the inherently complex domain of cross-chain transaction tracing. We introduce Thor25, a benchmark dataset comprising over 151k real-world cross-chain forensic records, and evaluate LOCARD on the Group-Transfer Tracing task for dismantling Sybil clusters. Validated against representative laundering sub-flows from the Bybit hack, LOCARD achieves high-fidelity tracing results, providing empirical evidence that modeling blockchain forensics as an autonomous agentic task is both viable and effective. These results establish a concrete foundation for future agentic approaches to large-scale blockchain forensic analysis. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/xhyumiracle/locard and https://github.com/xhyumiracle/thorchain-crosschain-data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
12 of 26 references.
References · 12
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Surveycited by 195
- 2023Blockchain Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2021GraphSense: A General-Purpose Cryptoasset Analytics Platformcited by 3
- 2022TRacer: Scalable Graph-based Transaction Tracing for Account-based Blockchain Trading Systemscited by 3
- 2024CONNECTOR: Enhancing the Traceability of Decentralized Bridge Applications via Automatic Cross-chain Transaction Associationcited by 3
- 2025XChainDataGen: A Cross-Chain Dataset Generation Frameworkcited by 1
- 2025Track and Trace: Automatically Uncovering Cross-chain Transactions in the Multi-blockchain Ecosystemscited by 1
- 2025A Survey of Transaction Tracing Techniques for Blockchain Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025RISKTAGGER: Evidence-Guided LLM Agent for Post-Incident Forensic Analysis of Money Laundering in Web3 ↗
- 2026A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits
- 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
- 2026TxRay: Agentic Postmortem of Live Blockchain Attacks
- 2026Zer0n: An AI-Assisted Vulnerability Discovery and Blockchain-Backed Integrity Framework
- 2026ChainClaw: A Layered Agent Framework for Reliable On-Chain Execution
- 2026LEDGER: Claim-to-Evidence Trace Graphs for Auditing LLM Agents
- 2025Human-Centered LLM-Agent System for Detecting Anomalous Digital Asset Transactions