Earth Embeddings Reveal Diverse Urban Signals from Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conventional urban indicators derived from censuses, surveys, and administrative records are often costly, spatially inconsistent, and slow to update. Recent geospatial foundation models enable Earth embeddings, compact satellite image representations transferable across downstream tasks, but their utility for neighborhood-scale urban monitoring remains unclear. Here, we benchmark three Earth embedding families, AlphaEarth, Prithvi, and Clay, for urban signal prediction across six U.S. metropolitan areas from 2020 to 2023. Using a unified supervised-learning framework, we predict 14 neighborhood-level indicators spanning crime, income, health, and travel behavior, and evaluate performance under four settings: global, city-wise, year-wise, and city-year. Results show that Earth embeddings capture substantial urban variation, with the highest predictive skill for outcomes more directly tied to built-environment structure, including chronic health burdens and dominant commuting modes. By contrast, indicators shaped more strongly by fine-scale behavior and local policy, such as cycling, remain difficult to infer. Predictive performance varies markedly across cities but remains comparatively stable across years, indicating strong spatial heterogeneity alongside temporal robustness. Exploratory analysis suggests that cross-city variation in predictive performance is associated with urban form in task-specific ways. Controlled dimensionality experiments show that representation efficiency is critical: compact 64-dimensional AlphaEarth embeddings remain more informative than 64-dimensional reductions of Prithvi and Clay. This study establishes a benchmark for evaluating Earth embeddings in urban remote sensing and demonstrates their potential as scalable, low-cost features for SDG-aligned neighborhood-scale urban monitoring.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
13 of 66 references.
References · 13
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
- 2022SatMAE: Pre-training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 408
- 2024Prithvi-EO-2.0: A Versatile Multi-Temporal Foundation Model for Earth Observation Applicationscited by 144
- 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 137
- 2021Recent Advances in Domain Adaptation for the Classification of Remote Sensing Datacited by 70
- 2024Foundation Models for Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: A Surveycited by 70
- 2017Using Deep Learning and Google Street View to Estimate the Demographic Makeup of the UScited by 66
- 2024Coverage and Bias of Street View Imagery in Mapping the Urban Environmentcited by 12
- 2025Harvesting AlphaEarth: Benchmarking the Geospatial Foundation Model for Agricultural Downstream Taskscited by 9
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.