mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beauty in the Eye of AI: Aligning LLMs and Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Network Visualization

arXiv 2604.03417 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Network visualization has traditionally relied on heuristic metrics, such as stress, under the assumption that optimizing them leads to aesthetic and informative layouts. However, no single metric consistently produces the most effective results. A data-driven alternative is to learn from human preferences, where annotators select their favored visualization among multiple layouts of the same graphs. These human-preference labels can then be used to train a generative model that approximates human aesthetic preferences. However, obtaining human labels at scale is costly and time-consuming. As a result, this generative approach has so far been tested only with machine-labeled data. In this paper, we explore the use of large language models (LLMs) and vision models (VMs) as proxies for human judgment. Through a carefully designed user study involving 27 participants, we curated a large set of human preference labels. We used this data both to better understand human preferences and to bootstrap LLM/VM labelers. We show that prompt engineering that combines few-shot examples and diverse input formats, such as image embeddings, significantly improves LLM-human alignment, and additional filtering by the confidence score of the LLM pushes the alignment to human-human levels. Furthermore, we demonstrate that carefully trained VMs can achieve VM-human alignment at a level comparable to that between human annotators. Our results suggest that AI can feasibly serve as a scalable proxy for human labelers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

Builds on

20 of 46 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  4. 2018Data2Vis: Automatic Generation of Data Visualizations Using Sequence to Sequence Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 47
  5. 2024Generative AI for Visualization: State of the Art and Future Directionscited by 23
  6. 2019A Deep Generative Model for Graph Layoutcited by 19
  7. 2019DeepDrawing: A Deep Learning Approach to Graph Drawingcited by 15
  8. 2018Evaluating the Readability of Force Directed Graph Layouts: A Deep Learning Approachcited by 14
  9. 2021DeepGD: A Deep Learning Framework for Graph Drawing Using GNNcited by 10
  10. 2024How Aligned are Human Chart Takeaways and LLM Predictions? A Case Study on Bar Charts with Varying Layoutscited by 10
  11. 2021Graph Neural Networks for Graph Drawingcited by 8
  12. 2021Deep Neural Network for DrawiNg Networks, (DNN)^2cited by 6
8 more
  1. 2022SmartGD: A GAN-Based Graph Drawing Framework for Diverse Aesthetic Goalscited by 6
  2. 2023Ask and You Shall Receive (a Graph Drawing): Testing ChatGPT's Potential to Apply Graph Layout Algorithmscited by 6
  3. 2018Aesthetic Discrimination of Graph Layoutscited by 5
  4. 2018A Heuristic Approach towards Drawings of Graphs with High Crossing Resolutioncited by 4
  5. 2019Stress-Plus-X (SPX) Graph Layoutcited by 3
  6. 2021Learning to Automate Chart Layout Configurations Using Crowdsourced Paired Comparisoncited by 2
  7. 2024The Perception of Stress in Graph Drawingscited by 2
  8. 2021A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Human Preference for Graph Layoutscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DesignSense: A Human Preference Dataset and Reward Modeling Framework for Graphic Layout Generation
  2. 2026Can Vision Language Models Assess Graphic Design Aesthetics? A Benchmark, Evaluation, and Dataset Perspective
  3. 2026Visual Persuasion: What Influences Decisions of Vision-Language Models?
  4. 2024Aligning Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Retrieval: Benchmarks and Algorithms
  5. 2024DracoGPT: Extracting Visualization Design Preferences from Large Language Models
  6. 2024Multimodal Large Language Model is a Human-Aligned Annotator for Text-to-Image Generation
  7. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis
  8. 2026TASTE: A Designer-Annotated Multi-Dimensional Preference Dataset for AI-Generated Graphic Design