Effect of Input Resolution on Retinal Vessel Segmentation Performance: An Empirical Study Across Five Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most deep learning pipelines for retinal vessel segmentation resize fundus images to satisfy GPU memory constraints and enable uniform batch processing. However, the impact of this resizing on thin vessel detection remains underexplored. When high resolution images are downsampled, thin vessels are reduced to subpixel structures, causing irreversible information loss even before the data enters the network. Standard volumetric metrics such as the Dice score do not capture this loss because thick vessel pixels dominate the evaluation. We investigated this effect by training a baseline UNet at multiple downsampling ratios across five fundus datasets (DRIVE, STARE, CHASE_DB1, HRF, and FIVES) with native widths ranging from 565 to 3504 pixels, keeping all other settings fixed. We introduce a width-stratified sensitivity metric that evaluates thin (half-width <3 pixels), medium (3 to 7 pixels), and thick (>7 pixels) vessel detection separately, using native resolution width estimates derived from a Euclidean distance transform. Results show that for high-resolution datasets (HRF, FIVES), thin vessel sensitivity improves monotonically as images are downsampled toward the encoder's effective operating range, peaking at processed widths between 256 and 876 pixels. For low-to-mid resolution datasets (DRIVE, STARE, CHASE_DB1), thin vessel sensitivity is highest at or near native resolution and degrades with any downsampling. Across all five datasets, aggressive downsampling reduced thin vessel sensitivity by up to 15.8 percentage points (DRIVE) while Dice remained relatively stable, confirming that Dice alone is insufficient for evaluating microvascular segmentation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2020clDice -- A Novel Topology-Preserving Loss Function for Tubular Structure Segmentationcited by 294
- 2024Topograph: An efficient Graph-Based Framework for Strictly Topology Preserving Image Segmentationcited by 17
- 2021The RETA Benchmark for Retinal Vascular Tree Analysiscited by 13
- 2024Benchmarking Retinal Blood Vessel Segmentation Models for Cross-Dataset and Cross-Disease Generalizationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.