Differentiable Symbolic Planning: A Neural Architecture for Constraint Reasoning with Learned Feasibility
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks excel at pattern recognition but struggle with constraint reasoning -- determining whether configurations satisfy logical or physical constraints. We introduce Differentiable Symbolic Planning (DSP), a neural architecture that performs discrete symbolic reasoning while remaining fully differentiable. DSP maintains a feasibility channel (phi) that tracks constraint satisfaction evidence at each node, aggregates this into a global feasibility signal (Phi) through learned rule-weighted combination, and uses sparsemax attention to achieve exact-zero discrete rule selection. We integrate DSP into a Universal Cognitive Kernel (UCK) that combines graph attention with iterative constraint propagation. Evaluated on three constraint reasoning benchmarks -- graph reachability, Boolean satisfiability, and planning feasibility -- UCK+DSP achieves 97.4% accuracy on planning under 4x size generalization (vs. 59.7% for ablated baselines), 96.4% on SAT under 2x generalization, and maintains balanced performance on both positive and negative classes where standard neural approaches collapse. Ablation studies reveal that global phi aggregation is critical: removing it causes accuracy to drop from 98% to 64%. The learned phi signal exhibits interpretable semantics, with values of +18 for feasible cases and -13 for infeasible cases emerging without supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 14 references.
References · 10
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
- 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 200
- 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 170
- 2016Value Iteration Networkscited by 160
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
- 2022The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 106
- 2019Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem Provingcited by 55
- 2017Action Schema Networks: Generalised Policies with Deep Learningcited by 32
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Reasoning under Perceptual Uncertainty: Bridging Continuous Perception and Discrete Symbolic Planning
- 2026G-RRM: Guiding Symbolic Solvers with Recurrent Reasoning Models
- 2025Constraints-Guided Diffusion Reasoner for Neuro-Symbolic Learning
- 2024Neuro-symbolic Learning Yielding Logical Constraints
- 2025Hierarchical Neuro-Symbolic Decision Transformer
- 2025LOOP: A Plug-and-Play Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Enhancing Planning in Autonomous Systems
- 2026Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems
- 2024Fast and Accurate Task Planning using Neuro-Symbolic Language Models and Multi-level Goal Decomposition