mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

G-RRM: Guiding Symbolic Solvers with Recurrent Reasoning Models

arXiv 2607.02491 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we focus on SE-RRMs, a symbol-equivariant instantiation of RRMs that exhibits improved extrapolation to larger problem sizes. We propose a neuro-symbolic approach, ``Guiding with Recurrent Reasoning Models'' (G-RRM), which integrates SE-RRMs with symbolic solvers for constraint satisfaction problems. SE-RRMs act as neural solvers that generate full solution proposals and guide classical symbolic solvers, such as backtracking or SAT-based methods like Glucose 4.1 and CaDiCaL 3.0.0, that produce globally correct solutions. Centrally, we investigate when neural guidance with G-RRM improves the search efficiency of symbolic solvers. % Our experiments show that the efficacy of G-RRM depends on two conditions: first, the problem instances must have an expansive combinatorial search space to expose potential gains, and second, the solver architecture must be capable of dynamically overwriting its branching choices to recover when neural hints are imperfect. When these conditions hold, guidance drives median conflict counts to zero and yields significant wall-clock speedups: on 9×9 Sudoku, where the SE-RRM correctly solves 91.1% of instances, backtracking accelerates by 33.3× and Glucose 4.1 by 1.70× (median, p<0.001), with Glucose 4.1 retaining a 1.17× speedup on perfect-hint 25×25 grids. In contrast, CaDiCaL 3.0.0, whose runtime is overhead-dominated and which always respects the injected branching hints rather than overwriting them, shows no significant speedup (median 1.02×, n.s.) and even a small significant mean slowdown (0.90×) on 9×9. These results delineate the regimes in which neural guidance translates into practical speedups.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Symbol-Equivariant Recurrent Reasoning Models2 Mar
  2. 2025Sudoku-Bench: Evaluating creative reasoning with Sudoku variants22 May

Other references · 9

  1. 2023Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thoughtcited by 221
  2. 2025ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systemscited by 190
  3. 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 177
  4. 2019SATNet: Bridging deep learning and logical reasoning using a differentiable satisfiability solvercited by 173
  5. 2023Looped Transformers are Better at Learning Learning Algorithmscited by 149
  6. 2023Semantic Strengthening of Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 12
  7. 2024A Survey on Verification and Validation, Testing and Evaluations of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligencecited by 10
  8. 2025Teaching Transformers to Solve Combinatorial Problems through Efficient Trial & Errorcited by 3
  9. 2023Neuro-Symbolic Sudoku Solvercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Adaptive LLM-Symbolic Reasoning via Dynamic Logical Solver Composition
  2. 2026Differentiable Symbolic Planning: A Neural Architecture for Constraint Reasoning with Learned Feasibility
  3. 2025Constraints-Guided Diffusion Reasoner for Neuro-Symbolic Learning
  4. 2026Neuro-symbolic PRM: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning via Structured Traces and Symbolic Verification
  5. 2023Empirical Investigation of Neural Symbolic Reasoning Strategies
  6. 2024Softened Symbol Grounding for Neuro-symbolic Systems
  7. 2026Dense Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning in a Unified Geometry State
  8. 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Analytical Solutions of Differential Equations