mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Multi-Agent Human-LLM Collaborative Framework for Closed-Loop Scientific Literature Summarization

arXiv 2604.01452 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific discovery is slowed by fragmented literature that requires excessive human effort to gather, analyze, and understand. AI tools, including autonomous summarization and question answering, have been developed to aid in understanding scientific literature. However, these tools lack the structured, multi-step approach necessary for extracting deep insights from scientific literature. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new possibilities for literature analysis, but remain unreliable due to hallucinations and incomplete extraction. We introduce Elhuyar, a multi-agent, human-in-the-loop system that integrates LLMs, structured AI, and human scientists to extract, analyze, and iteratively refine insights from scientific literature. The framework distributes tasks among specialized agents for filtering papers, extracting data, fitting models, and summarizing findings, with human oversight ensuring reliability. The system generates structured reports with extracted data, visualizations, model equations, and text summaries, enabling deeper inquiry through iterative refinement. Deployed in materials science, it analyzed literature on tungsten under helium-ion irradiation, showing experimentally correlated exponential helium bubble growth with irradiation dose and temperature, offering insight for plasma-facing materials (PFMs) in fusion reactors. This demonstrates how AI-assisted literature review can uncover scientific patterns and accelerate discovery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

12 of 43 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  4. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 656
  5. 2021Retrieving and Reading: A Comprehensive Survey on Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 178
  6. 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 168
  7. 2020PICK: Processing Key Information Extraction from Documents using Improved Graph Learning-Convolutional Networkscited by 70
  8. 2021Keyphrase Generation for Scientific Document Retrievalcited by 23
  9. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation for Domain-specific Question Answeringcited by 22
  10. 2020Capturing Global Informativeness in Open Domain Keyphrase Extractioncited by 17
  11. 2022Multi-Document Scientific Summarization from a Knowledge Graph-Centric Viewcited by 11
  12. 2023Evaluating LLMs on Document-Based QA: Exact Answer Selection and Numerical Extraction using Cogtale datasetcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Knowledge to Action: Outcomes of the 2025 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry
  2. 2025LLM Agents for Knowledge Discovery in Atomic Layer Processing
  3. 2024HoneyComb: A Flexible LLM-Based Agent System for Materials Science
  4. 2023Agent-based Learning of Materials Datasets from Scientific Literature
  5. 2025Large language models in materials science and the need for open-source approaches
  6. 2026MIND: AI Co-Scientist for Material Research
  7. 2026Skill-Contracted Agents for Evidence-Aware Materials Literature Analysis
  8. 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning