mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OrgAgent: Organize Your Multi-Agent System like a Company

arXiv 2604.01020 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.MA cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

While large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown strong potential for complex reasoning, how to effectively organize multiple agents remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce OrgAgent, a company-style hierarchical multi-agent framework that separates collaboration into governance, execution, and compliance layers. OrgAgent decomposes multi-agent reasoning into three layers: a governance layer for planning and resource allocation, an execution layer for task solving and review, and a compliance layer for final answer control. By evaluating the framework across reasoning tasks, LLMs, execution modes, and execution policies, we find that multi-agent systems organized in a company-style hierarchy generally outperform other organizational structures. Besides, hierarchical coordination also reduces token consumption relative to flat collaboration in most settings. For example, for GPT-OSS-120B, the hierarchical setting improves performance over flat multi-agent system by 102.73% while reducing token usage by 74.52% on SQuAD 2.0. Further analysis shows that hierarchy helps most when tasks benefit from stable skill assignment, controlled information flow, and layered verification. Overall, our findings highlight organizational structure as an important factor in multi-agent reasoning, shaping not only effectiveness and cost, but also coordination behavior.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

7 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025From Bits to Boardrooms: A Cutting-Edge Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Business Excellence21 Aug
  2. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar

Other references · 5

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  3. 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
  4. 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 195
  5. 2025Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debatecited by 55

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agensh: Scaling Organizational Intelligence to 1,024 Agents
  2. 2026Org-Agent: Beyond Personal Assistants Towards Organizational Agents
  3. 2026Toward an Organizational Science of Multi-Agent LLM Systems: Decoupling Who, How, and Which Algorithm
  4. 2025Beyond Frameworks: Unpacking Collaboration Strategies in Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence
  6. 2025Towards Multi-Agent Reasoning Systems for Collaborative Expertise Delegation: An Exploratory Design Study
  7. 2025AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
  8. 2026Token-Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration via System One-Guided Computational Division of Labor