mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Informed Machine Learning with Knowledge Landmarks

arXiv 2604.00256 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Informed Machine Learning has emerged as a viable generalization of Machine Learning (ML) by building a unified conceptual and algorithmic setting for constructing models on a unified basis of knowledge and data. Physics-informed ML involving physics equations is one of the developments within Informed Machine Learning. This study proposes a novel direction of Knowledge-Data ML, referred to as KD-ML, where numeric data are integrated with knowledge tidbits expressed in the form of granular knowledge landmarks. We advocate that data and knowledge are complementary in several fundamental ways: data are precise (numeric) and local, usually confined to some region of the input space, while knowledge is global and formulated at a higher level of abstraction. The knowledge can be represented as information granules and organized as a collection of input-output information granules called knowledge landmarks. In virtue of this evident complementarity, we develop a comprehensive design process of the KD-ML model and formulate an original augmented loss function L, which additively embraces the component responsible for optimizing the model based on available numeric data, while the second component, playing the role of a granular regularizer, so that it adheres to the granular constraints (knowledge landmarks). We show the role of the hyperparameter positioned in the loss function, which balances the contribution and guiding role of data and knowledge, and point to some essential tendencies associated with the quality of data (noise level) and the level of granularity of the knowledge landmarks. Experiments on two physics-governed benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed KD model consistently outperforms data-driven ML models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

17 of 45 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  3. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  5. 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 221
  6. 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 207
  7. 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 205
  8. 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
  9. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 164
  10. 2021Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learningcited by 87
  11. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 71
  12. 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 65
5 more
  1. 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
  2. 2019SoftAdapt: Techniques for Adaptive Loss Weighting of Neural Networks with Multi-Part Loss Functionscited by 40
  3. 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Implicationscited by 15
  4. 2024Domain knowledge-guided machine learning framework for state of health estimation in Lithium-ion batteriescited by 1
  5. 2025S2FS: Spatially-Aware Separability-Driven Feature Selection in Fuzzy Decision Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.