mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AGFT: Alignment-Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2603.29410 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit strong zero-shot generalization but remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Existing classification-guided adversarial fine-tuning methods often disrupt pre-trained cross-modal alignment, weakening visual-textual correspondence and degrading zero-shot performance. In this paper, we propose an Alignment-Guided Fine-Tuning (AGFT) framework that enhances zero-shot adversarial robustness while preserving the cross-modal semantic structure. Unlike label-based methods that rely on hard labels and fail to maintain the relative relationships between image and text, AGFT leverages the probabilistic predictions of the original model for text-guided adversarial training, which aligns adversarial visual features with textual embeddings via soft alignment distributions, improving zero-shot adversarial robustness. To address structural discrepancies introduced by fine-tuning, we introduce a distribution consistency calibration mechanism that adjusts the robust model output to match a temperature-scaled version of the pre-trained model predictions. Extensive experiments across multiple zero-shot benchmarks demonstrate that AGFT outperforms state-of-the-art methods while significantly improving zero-shot adversarial robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

46 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
  2. 2024TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models20 Nov
  3. 2024Text-Guided Attention is All You Need for Zero-Shot Robustness in Vision-Language Models29 Oct
  4. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models4 Mar
  5. 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan
  6. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models19 Nov
  7. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
  8. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec
  9. 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Models19 Jun

Other references · 37

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  9. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  10. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  12. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
25 more
  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  2. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  3. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  4. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  7. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  9. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  10. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  11. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  12. 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 580
  13. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
  14. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
  15. 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
  16. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
  17. 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 352
  18. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  19. 2021VisualGPT: Data-efficient Adaptation of Pretrained Language Models for Image Captioningcited by 190
  20. 2025Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Modelscited by 89
  21. 2020Patch-wise Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networkcited by 78
  22. 2025PolaFormer: Polarity-aware Linear Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 30
  23. 2025CLIP is Strong Enough to Fight Back: Test-time Counterattacks towards Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness of CLIPcited by 23
  24. 2020Patch-wise++ Perturbation for Adversarial Targeted Attackscited by 19
  25. 2024Transferable Adversarial Face Attack with Text Controlled Attributecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hierarchically Robust Zero-shot Vision-language Models
  2. 2025Navigating the Trade-off: A Synthesis of Defensive Strategies for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Quality Text, Robust Vision: The Role of Language in Enhancing Visual Robustness of Vision-Language Models
  4. 2023Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization
  5. 2026Dual Adversarial Fine-tuning for Enhancing Robustness of Large Vision Language Model
  6. 2026Finetune Like You Pretrain: Boosting Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness in Vision-language Models
  7. 2026Unifying Adversarially Robust Model Experts in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025StarFT: Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Spuriosity Alignment