Unbiased Model Prediction Without Using Protected Attribute Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of bias persists in the deep learning community as models continue to provide disparate performance across different demographic subgroups. Therefore, several algorithms have been proposed to improve the fairness of deep models. However, a majority of these algorithms utilize the protected attribute information for bias mitigation, which severely limits their application in real-world scenarios. To address this concern, we have proposed a novel algorithm, termed as Non-Protected Attribute-based Debiasing (NPAD) algorithm for bias mitigation, that does not require the protected attribute information. The proposed NPAD algorithm utilizes the auxiliary information provided by the non-protected attributes to optimize the model for bias mitigation. Further, two different loss functions, Debiasing via Attribute Cluster Loss (DACL) and Filter Redundancy Loss (FRL) have been proposed to optimize the model for fairness goals. Multiple experiments are performed on the LFWA and CelebA datasets for facial attribute prediction, and a significant reduction in bias across different gender and age subgroups is observed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
- 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 262
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2015A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labelscited by 126
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
- 2019Generative Adversarial Minority Oversamplingcited by 72
- 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
- 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
- 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
- 2020InsideBias: Measuring Bias in Deep Networks and Application to Face Gender Biometricscited by 31
7 more
- 2022Bias Mimicking: A Simple Sampling Approach for Bias Mitigationcited by 30
- 2020FairALM: Augmented Lagrangian Method for Training Fair Models with Little Regretcited by 22
- 2021Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Modelscited by 11
- 2021Does Data Repair Lead to Fair Models? Curating Contextually Fair Data To Reduce Model Biascited by 11
- 2020Fair and accurate age prediction using distribution aware data curation and augmentationcited by 3
- 2022Mitigating Bias in Facial Analysis Systems by Incorporating Label Diversitycited by 2
- 2024Marginal Debiased Network for Fair Visual Recognitioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.