Benchmarking LLMs in an Embodied Environment for Blue Team Threat Hunting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As cyber threats continue to grow in scale and sophistication, blue team defenders increasingly require advanced tools to proactively detect and mitigate risks. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for enhancing threat analysis. However, their effectiveness in real-world blue team threat-hunting scenarios remains insufficiently explored. In this paper, we present CYBERTEAM, a benchmark designed to guide LLMs in blue teaming practice. CYBERTEAM constructs an embodied environment in two stages. First, it models realistic threat-hunting workflows by capturing the dependencies among analytical tasks from threat attribution to incident response. Next, each task is addressed through a set of embodied functions tailored to its specific analytical requirements. This transforms the overall threat-hunting process into a structured sequence of function-driven operations, where each node represents a discrete function and edges define the execution order. Guided by this framework, LLMs are directed to perform threat-hunting tasks through modular steps. Overall, CYBERTEAM integrates 30 tasks and 9 embodied functions, guiding LLMs through pipelined threat analysis. We evaluate leading LLMs and state-of-the-art cybersecurity agents, comparing CYBERTEAM's embodied function-calling against fundamental elicitation strategies. Our results offer valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs in threat hunting, laying the foundation for the practical adoption in real-world cybersecurity applications.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 6
- 2025From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localizationcited by 4
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agentscited by 3
- 2026Beyond Success Rate: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Offensive and Defensive Security Agentscited by 1
- 2026Beyond Success Rate: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Offensive and Defensive Security Agents16 Jul 2026
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents13 Apr 2026
- 2025From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localization30 Sep 2025
- 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence28 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting
- 2023LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing
- 2026Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps
- 2025From Promise to Peril: Rethinking Cybersecurity Red and Blue Teaming in the Age of LLMs
- 2026Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM
- 2024Multi-Agent Collaboration in Incident Response with Large Language Models
- 2023Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environments
- 2025DefenderBench: A Toolkit for Evaluating Language Agents in Cybersecurity Environments