Standardised schema and taxonomy for AI incident databases in critical digital infrastructure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in critical digital infrastructure introduces significant risks, necessitating a robust framework for systematically collecting AI incident data to prevent future incidents. Existing databases lack the granularity as well as the standardized structure required for consistent data collection and analysis, impeding effective incident management. This work proposes a standardized schema and taxonomy for AI incident databases, addressing these challenges by enabling detailed and structured documentation of AI incidents across sectors. Key contributions include developing a unified schema, introducing new fields such as incident severity, causes, and harms caused, and proposing a taxonomy for classifying AI incidents in critical digital infrastructure. The proposed solution facilitates more effective incident data collection and analysis, thus supporting evidence-based policymaking, enhancing industry safety measures, and promoting transparency. This work lays the foundation for a coordinated global response to AI incidents, ensuring trust, safety, and accountability in using AI across regions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.
Builds on
2 of 32 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certificationcited by 2
- 2025Incorporating AI incident reporting into telecommunications law and policy: Insights from Indiacited by 1
- 2026A federated architecture for sector-led AI governance: lessons from Indiacited by 1
- 2026Why AI Harms Can't Be Fixed One Identity at a Time: What 5300 Incident Reports Reveal About Intersectionalitycited by 0
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speechcited by 0
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speech6 Jul 2026
- 2026Why AI Harms Can't Be Fixed One Identity at a Time: What 5300 Incident Reports Reveal About Intersectionality27 Apr 2026
- 2026A federated architecture for sector-led AI governance: lessons from India27 Mar 2026
- 2025A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification14 Sep 2025
- 2025Incorporating AI incident reporting into telecommunications law and policy: Insights from India11 Sep 2025