Optimization Trade-offs in Asynchronous Federated Learning: A Stochastic Networks Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synchronous federated learning scales poorly due to the straggler effect. Asynchronous algorithms increase the update throughput by processing updates upon arrival, but they introduce two fundamental challenges: gradient staleness, which degrades convergence, and bias toward faster clients under heterogeneous data distributions. Although algorithms such as AsyncSGD and Generalized AsyncSGD mitigate this bias via client-side task queues, most existing analyses neglect the underlying queueing dynamics and lack closed-form characterizations of the update throughput and gradient staleness. To close this gap, we develop a stochastic queueing-network framework for Generalized AsyncSGD that jointly models random computation times at the clients and the central server, as well as random uplink and downlink communication delays. Leveraging product-form network theory, we derive a closed-form expression for the update throughput, alongside closed-form upper bounds for both the communication round complexity and the expected wall-clock time required to reach an ε-stationary point. These results formally characterize the trade-off between gradient staleness and wall-clock convergence speed. We further extend the framework to quantify energy consumption under stochastic timing, revealing an additional trade-off between convergence speed and energy efficiency. Building on these analytical results, we propose gradient-based optimization strategies to jointly optimize routing and concurrency. Experiments on EMNIST demonstrate reductions of 29%--46% in convergence time and 36%--49% in energy consumption compared to AsyncSGD.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.
Builds on
11 of 67 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2019Asynchronous Federated Optimizationcited by 267
- 2025Ringmaster ASGD: The First Asynchronous SGD with Optimal Time Complexitycited by 18
- 2022DASHA: Distributed Nonconvex Optimization with Communication Compression, Optimal Oracle Complexity, and No Client Synchronizationcited by 16
- 2022Adaptive Compression for Communication-Efficient Distributed Trainingcited by 16
- 2021Learning Under Delayed Feedback: Implicitly Adapting to Gradient Delayscited by 7
- 2017More Iterations per Second, Same Quality -- Why Asynchronous Algorithms may Drastically Outperform Traditional Onescited by 6
- 2024MindFlayer SGD: Efficient Parallel SGD in the Presence of Heterogeneous and Random Worker Compute Timescited by 6
- 2024Asynchronous Multi-Server Federated Learning for Geo-Distributed Clientscited by 3
- 2025FuSeFL: Fully Secure and Scalable Federated Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.