mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PoiCGAN: A Targeted Poisoning Based on Feature-Label Joint Perturbation in Federated Learning

arXiv 2603.23574 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL), as a popular distributed learning paradigm, has shown outstanding performance in improving computational efficiency and protecting data privacy, and is widely applied in industrial image classification. However, due to its distributed nature, FL is vulnerable to threats from malicious clients, with poisoning attacks being a common threat. A major limitation of existing poisoning attack methods is their difficulty in bypassing model performance tests and defense mechanisms based on model anomaly detection. This often results in the detection and removal of poisoned models, which undermines their practical utility. To ensure both the performance of industrial image classification and attacks, we propose a targeted poisoning attack, PoiCGAN, based on feature-label collaborative perturbation. Our method modifies the inputs of the discriminator and generator in the Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CGAN) to influence the training process, generating an ideal poison generator. This generator not only produces specific poisoned samples but also automatically performs label flipping. Experiments across various datasets show that our method achieves an attack success rate 83.97% higher than baseline methods, with a less than 8.87% reduction in the main task's accuracy. Moreover, the poisoned samples and malicious models exhibit high stealthiness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 67 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  3. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  4. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  5. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  6. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
  7. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  8. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
  9. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
  10. 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 119
  11. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
  12. 2020Defending against Backdoors in Federated Learning with Robust Learning Ratecited by 82
10 more
  1. 2024A Unified Anomaly Synthesis Strategy with Gradient Ascent for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 74
  2. 2025Data Poisoning in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 20
  3. 2022FedRecAttack: Model Poisoning Attack to Federated Recommendationcited by 18
  4. 2024Supervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Imagescited by 18
  5. 2023InsPLAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Power Line Asset Inspection in UAV Imagescited by 15
  6. 2024Beyond Traditional Threats: A Persistent Backdoor Attack on Federated Learningcited by 15
  7. 2021Untargeted Poisoning Attack Detection in Federated Learning via Behavior Attestationcited by 12
  8. 2022Semi-Targeted Model Poisoning Attack on Federated Learning via Backward Error Analysiscited by 9
  9. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Machine Learning Driven Material Defect Detectioncited by 5
  10. 2023Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.