Mecha-nudges for Machines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents are becoming active decision-makers on the Internet. As they make decisions in the same environments as humans, the environments themselves can change to influence them. We call this textitmecha-nudging: changes to how choices are presented that systematically influence AI agents without materially degrading the decision environment for humans. To measure this phenomenon, we combine two frameworks---Bayesian persuasion from economics and V-usable information from computer science---to get a common unit (bits) for quantifying how environments change across a wide range of interventions, contexts, and models. We apply this framework to over six million Etsy listings and find that, after ChatGPT's release, listings contain significantly more machine-usable information for predicting agent curation decisions, increasing by 0.143 bits out of a maximum possible increase of 0.355. This shift is robust across prompts, token choices, labeling models, and fine-tuning architectures; absent in a regulated-text placebo; and far larger than the effect of generic LLM rewriting. In contrast, a human study finds little to no change in human-usable information. Our results provide the first large-scale evidence that systematic mecha-nudging is already occurring in the wild, but going unnoticed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
15 of 56 references.
References · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
- 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
- 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 153
- 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 61
- 2016Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Textcited by 51
- 2025Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Developmentcited by 42
- 2022The Authenticity Gap in Human Evaluationcited by 24
- 2025A Framework for Studying AI Agent Behavior: Evidence from Consumer Choice Experimentscited by 10
- 2025LLM Agents Are Hypersensitive to Nudgescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.