Robustness Quantification for Discriminative Models: a New Robustness Metric and its Application to Dynamic Classifier Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Among the different possible strategies for evaluating the reliability of individual predictions of classifiers, robustness quantification stands out as a method that evaluates how much uncertainty a classifier could cope with before changing its prediction. However, its applicability is more limited than some of its alternatives, since it requires the use of generative models and restricts the analyses either to specific model architectures or discrete features. In this work, we propose a new robustness metric applicable to any probabilistic discriminative classifier and any type of features. We demonstrate that this new metric is capable of distinguishing between reliable and unreliable predictions, and use this observation to develop new strategies for dynamic classifier selection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
8 of 24 references.
References · 8
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2020PMLB v1.0: An open source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methodscited by 58
- 2018DESlib: A Dynamic ensemble selection library in Pythoncited by 18
- 2020Towards Robust Classification with Deep Generative Forestscited by 5
- 2025Robustness quantification: a new method for assessing the reliability of the predictions of a classifiercited by 4
- 2025Robustness and uncertainty: two complementary aspects of the reliability of the predictions of a classifiercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.