mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness quantification: a new method for assessing the reliability of the predictions of a classifier

arXiv 2503.22418 ↗First posted 28 Mar 2025cs.LG math.PRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Based on existing ideas in the field of imprecise probabilities, we present a new approach for assessing the reliability of the individual predictions of a generative probabilistic classifier. We call this approach robustness quantification, compare it to uncertainty quantification, and demonstrate that it continues to work well even for classifiers that are learned from small training sets that are sampled from a shifted distribution.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  2. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  3. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  4. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  5. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  6. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  7. 2020Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Random Forestscited by 43
  8. 2024Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 22
  9. 2020Towards Robust Classification with Deep Generative Forestscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.