mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unlocking Post-hoc Dataset Inference with Synthetic Data

arXiv 2506.15271 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → LLM synthetic data generation

Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) can be mainly attributed to their massive training datasets, which are often scraped from the internet without respecting data owners' intellectual property rights. Dataset Inference (DI) offers a potential remedy by identifying whether a suspect dataset was used in training, thereby enabling data owners to verify unauthorized use. However, existing DI methods require a private set-known to be absent from training-that closely matches the compromised dataset's distribution. Such in-distribution, held-out data is rarely available in practice, severely limiting the applicability of DI. In this work, we address this challenge by synthetically generating the required held-out set. Our approach tackles two key obstacles: (1) creating high-quality, diverse synthetic data that accurately reflects the original distribution, which we achieve via a data generator trained on a carefully designed suffix-based completion task, and (2) bridging likelihood gaps between real and synthetic data, which is realized through post-hoc calibration. Extensive experiments on diverse text datasets show that using our generated data as a held-out set enables DI to detect the original training sets with high confidence, while maintaining a low false positive rate. This result empowers copyright owners to make legitimate claims on data usage and demonstrates our method's reliability for real-world litigations. Our code is available at https://github.com/sprintml/PostHocDatasetInference.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM synthetic data generation, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 37 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

37 of 50 references.

References · 37

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  7. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  8. 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 613
  9. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  10. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
  11. 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
  12. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 258
25 more
  1. 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
  2. 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
  3. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 195
  4. 2024RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Modelscited by 182
  5. 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 177
  6. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  7. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
  8. 2024Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 103
  9. 2023Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymorecited by 99
  10. 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 98
  11. 2023Flocks of Stochastic Parrots: Differentially Private Prompt Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 83
  12. 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 74
  13. 2024Blind Baselines Beat Membership Inference Attacks for Foundation Modelscited by 69
  14. 2024SoK: Membership Inference Attacks on LLMs are Rushing Nowhere (and How to Fix It)cited by 59
  15. 2023Paloma: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Model Fitcited by 54
  16. 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
  17. 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Datacited by 50
  18. 2022Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised Modelscited by 36
  19. 2024On the Privacy Risk of In-context Learningcited by 32
  20. 2022On the Difficulty of Defending Self-Supervised Learning against Model Extractioncited by 22
  21. 2025Exploring the limits of strong membership inference attacks on large language modelscited by 22
  22. 2024PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without Retrainingcited by 17
  23. 2024CDI: Copyrighted Data Identification in Diffusion Modelscited by 17
  24. 2025Privacy Attacks on Image AutoRegressive Modelscited by 15
  25. 2024Open LLMs are Necessary for Current Private Adaptations and Outperform their Closed Alternativescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and Pitfalls
  2. 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code
  3. 2024Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models
  4. 2024Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Synthetic Data in LLM Post-Training: A Reverse-Bottleneck Perspective
  5. 2025Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models
  6. 2026Synthesis Without Training: An Inference-Only Pipeline for Tabular, Temporal, and Relational Synthetic Data
  7. 2024On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models
  8. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Survey