mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CAPITU: A Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Brazilian Portuguese with Literary Context

arXiv 2603.22576 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce CAPITU, a benchmark for evaluating instruction-following capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Brazilian Portuguese. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on English or use generic prompts, CAPITU contextualizes all tasks within eight canonical works of Brazilian literature, combining verifiable instruction constraints with culturally-grounded content. The benchmark comprises 59 instruction types organized into seven categories, all designed to be automatically verifiable without requiring LLM judges or human evaluation. Instruction types include Portuguese-specific linguistic constraints (word termination patterns like -ando/-endo/-indo, -inho/-inha, -mente) and structural requirements. We evaluate 18 state-of-the-art models across single-turn and multi-turn settings. Our results show that frontier reasoning models achieve strong performance (GPT-5.2 with reasoning: 98.5% strict accuracy), while Portuguese-specialized models offer competitive cost-efficiency (Sabiazinho-4: 87.0% at 0.13 vs Claude-Haiku-4.5: 73.5% at 1.12). Multi-turn evaluation reveals significant variation in constraint persistence, with conversation-level accuracy ranging from 60% to 96% across models. We identify specific challenges in morphological constraints, exact counting, and constraint persistence degradation across turns. We release the complete benchmark, evaluation code, and baseline results to facilitate research on instruction-following in Portuguese.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 17 references.

References · 14

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  6. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  7. 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 194
  8. 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 135
  9. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 117
  10. 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 102
  11. 2024CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Modelscited by 11
  12. 2024Sabi'a-3 Technical Reportcited by 7
2 more
  1. 2026Sabi'a-4 Technical Reportcited by 6
  2. 2025PoETa v2: Toward More Robust Evaluation of Large Language Models in Portuguesecited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models
  2. 2026IndicIFEval: A Benchmark for Verifiable Instruction-Following Evaluation in 14 Indic Languages
  3. 2024Diverse and Fine-Grained Instruction-Following Ability Exploration with Synthetic Data
  4. 2025ReasonIF: Large Reasoning Models Fail to Follow Instructions During Reasoning
  5. 2025WangchanThaiInstruct: An instruction-following Dataset for Culture-Aware, Multitask, and Multi-domain Evaluation in Thai
  6. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructions
  7. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  8. 2025AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following