mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A transformer architecture alteration to incentivise externalised reasoning

arXiv 2603.21376 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a new architectural change, and post-training pipeline, for making LLMs more verbose reasoners by teaching a model to truncate forward passes early. We augment an existing transformer architecture with an early-exit mechanism at intermediate layers and train the model to exit at shallower layers when the next token can be predicted without deep computation. After a calibration stage, we incentivise the model to exit as early as possible while maintaining task performance using reinforcement learning. We provide preliminary results to this effect for small reasoning models, showing that they learn to adaptively reduce computations across tokens. We predict that, applied at the right scale, our approach can minimise the amount of excess computation that reasoning models have at their disposal to perform non-myopic planning using their internal activations, reserving this only for difficult-to-predict tokens.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  5. 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
  6. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
  7. 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 249
  8. 2024Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Modelscited by 191
  9. 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 121
  10. 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMscited by 108
  11. 2025When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitorscited by 88
  12. 2025CoT Red-Handed: Stress Testing Chain-of-Thought Monitoringcited by 54
3 more
  1. 2024Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?cited by 49
  2. 2024Explore Theory of Mind: Program-guided adversarial data generation for theory of mind reasoningcited by 33
  3. 2025Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of Thoughtcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning When to Stop: Adaptive Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2023Assessing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Encoder-Only Transformer Models
  3. 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalization
  4. 2023TART: A plug-and-play Transformer module for task-agnostic reasoning
  5. 2025Unleashing the Reasoning Potential of Pre-trained LLMs by Critique Fine-Tuning on One Problem
  6. 2025Learning to Reason Efficiently with Discounted Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Transformers Provably Learn Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Length Generalization
  8. 2026RISER: Orchestrating Latent Reasoning Skills for Adaptive Activation Steering