mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Inference Agency Formalization, Metrics, and Convergence Assessments

arXiv 2603.21319 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the critical challenge of mesa-optimization in AI safety by providing a formal definition of agency and a framework for its analysis. Agency is conceptualized as a Continuous Representation of accumulated experience that achieves autopoiesis through a dynamic balance between curiosity (minimizing prediction error to ensure non-computability and novelty) and empowerment (maximizing the control channel's information capacity to ensure subjectivity and goal-directedness). Empirical evidence suggests that this active inference-based model successfully accounts for classical instrumental goals, such as self-preservation and resource acquisition. The analysis demonstrates that the proposed agency function is smooth and convex, possessing favorable properties for optimization. While agentic functions occupy a vanishingly small fraction of the total abstract function space, they exhibit logarithmic convergence in sparse environments. This suggests a high probability for the spontaneous emergence of agency during the training of modern, large-scale models. To quantify the degree of agency, the paper introduces a metric based on the distance between the behavioral equivalents of a given system and an "ideal" agentic function within the space of canonicalized rewards (STARC). This formalization provides a concrete apparatus for classifying and detecting mesa-optimizers by measuring their proximity to an ideal agentic objective, offering a robust tool for analyzing and identifying undesirable inner optimization in complex AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 15 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  2. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  3. 2019Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systemscited by 250
  4. 2022Dynamics-Aware Comparison of Learned Reward Functionscited by 17
  5. 2023STARC: A General Framework For Quantifying Differences Between Reward Functionscited by 15
  6. 2025Computational Irreducibility as the Foundation of Agency: A Formal Model Connecting Undecidability to Autonomous Behavior in Complex Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Active Inference as a Model of Agency
  2. 2026Active Inference as the Test-Time Scaling Law for Physical AI Agents
  3. 2026Active Inference: A method for Phenotyping Agency in AI systems?
  4. 2019Bayesian policy selection using active inference
  5. 2022Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principles
  6. 2021Online reinforcement learning with sparse rewards through an active inference capsule
  7. 2026Agency and Architectural Limits: Why Optimization-Based Systems Cannot Be Norm-Responsive
  8. 2024Demonstrating the Continual Learning Capabilities and Practical Application of Discrete-Time Active Inference